{"title":"DiCS-Index:通过分析学习行为来预测学生在计算机科学中的表现","authors":"Dino Capovilla, Peter Hubwieser, P. Shah","doi":"10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many students with little pre-college exposure to computer science (CS) share widespread incorrect ideas and a negative attitude towards the subject, leading to wrong decisions when choosing their major. In order to support these students, we developed a questionnaire built on Kolb's and Pask's learning style theories. Our aim was to create an instrument that allows to predict student performance in CS based solely on non-subject specific information. Using 62 items from two questionnaires to operationalize the three personality traits as described by Kolb and Pask, we selected a subset of 15 items by comparing the results of students with high and low achievements in CS. Subsequently, we determined the so-called DiCS-Index by adding up the values of all these 15 items, where a high DiCS-Index suggests a good performance in CS. Finally, the instrument was tested at our local CS department. The analysis of the personality traits suggests that CS, as a course of studies, is open to a highly heterogeneous student body with varying preferences and strengths. The only significant difference found is a clearly better performance of students who prefer learning through abstract conceptualization as opposed to gathering concrete experience. Concerning the questionnaire, we found a clear distinction between students with high and low achievements indicated by a highly significant difference in their corresponding DiCS-Indices.","PeriodicalId":281941,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DiCS-Index: Predicting Student Performance in Computer Science by Analyzing Learning Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Dino Capovilla, Peter Hubwieser, P. Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many students with little pre-college exposure to computer science (CS) share widespread incorrect ideas and a negative attitude towards the subject, leading to wrong decisions when choosing their major. In order to support these students, we developed a questionnaire built on Kolb's and Pask's learning style theories. Our aim was to create an instrument that allows to predict student performance in CS based solely on non-subject specific information. Using 62 items from two questionnaires to operationalize the three personality traits as described by Kolb and Pask, we selected a subset of 15 items by comparing the results of students with high and low achievements in CS. Subsequently, we determined the so-called DiCS-Index by adding up the values of all these 15 items, where a high DiCS-Index suggests a good performance in CS. Finally, the instrument was tested at our local CS department. The analysis of the personality traits suggests that CS, as a course of studies, is open to a highly heterogeneous student body with varying preferences and strengths. The only significant difference found is a clearly better performance of students who prefer learning through abstract conceptualization as opposed to gathering concrete experience. Concerning the questionnaire, we found a clear distinction between students with high and low achievements indicated by a highly significant difference in their corresponding DiCS-Indices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
DiCS-Index: Predicting Student Performance in Computer Science by Analyzing Learning Behaviors
Many students with little pre-college exposure to computer science (CS) share widespread incorrect ideas and a negative attitude towards the subject, leading to wrong decisions when choosing their major. In order to support these students, we developed a questionnaire built on Kolb's and Pask's learning style theories. Our aim was to create an instrument that allows to predict student performance in CS based solely on non-subject specific information. Using 62 items from two questionnaires to operationalize the three personality traits as described by Kolb and Pask, we selected a subset of 15 items by comparing the results of students with high and low achievements in CS. Subsequently, we determined the so-called DiCS-Index by adding up the values of all these 15 items, where a high DiCS-Index suggests a good performance in CS. Finally, the instrument was tested at our local CS department. The analysis of the personality traits suggests that CS, as a course of studies, is open to a highly heterogeneous student body with varying preferences and strengths. The only significant difference found is a clearly better performance of students who prefer learning through abstract conceptualization as opposed to gathering concrete experience. Concerning the questionnaire, we found a clear distinction between students with high and low achievements indicated by a highly significant difference in their corresponding DiCS-Indices.