定价儿童,抑制女孩:中国独生子女政策期间的生育率和性别比

J. García
{"title":"定价儿童,抑制女孩:中国独生子女政策期间的生育率和性别比","authors":"J. García","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3455681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I provide the first empirical characterization of China’s One-Child Policy as it actually occurred: It was an individually tailored, age-specific pricing system allowing women to have more than one child. I exploit within-woman variation to identify the impact of the policy. The policy decreased the number of daughters that women had; it did not impact the number of sons. Data on abortions and ultrasound-technology availability support this finding. The policy impacted fertility throughout the period 1979-2000. Without the policy, the total fertility rate and average daughter-to-son ratio would have been 2.2 and 0.9 in 2000. Instead, they were 1.5 and 0.8.","PeriodicalId":105668,"journal":{"name":"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing Children, Curbing Daughters: Fertility and the Sex-Ratio During China's One-Child Policy\",\"authors\":\"J. García\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3455681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I provide the first empirical characterization of China’s One-Child Policy as it actually occurred: It was an individually tailored, age-specific pricing system allowing women to have more than one child. I exploit within-woman variation to identify the impact of the policy. The policy decreased the number of daughters that women had; it did not impact the number of sons. Data on abortions and ultrasound-technology availability support this finding. The policy impacted fertility throughout the period 1979-2000. Without the policy, the total fertility rate and average daughter-to-son ratio would have been 2.2 and 0.9 in 2000. Instead, they were 1.5 and 0.8.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3455681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3455681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我提供了中国独生子女政策实际实施时的第一个经验特征:这是一个针对个人量身定制的、针对年龄的定价系统,允许女性生育多个孩子。我利用女性内部的差异来确定该政策的影响。该政策减少了妇女生育女儿的数量;这并没有影响男孩的数量。堕胎和超声波技术的数据支持这一发现。该政策影响了1979-2000年期间的生育率。如果没有这项政策,2000年的总生育率和平均儿孙比将分别为2.2和0.9。相反,他们分别是1.5和0.8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pricing Children, Curbing Daughters: Fertility and the Sex-Ratio During China's One-Child Policy
I provide the first empirical characterization of China’s One-Child Policy as it actually occurred: It was an individually tailored, age-specific pricing system allowing women to have more than one child. I exploit within-woman variation to identify the impact of the policy. The policy decreased the number of daughters that women had; it did not impact the number of sons. Data on abortions and ultrasound-technology availability support this finding. The policy impacted fertility throughout the period 1979-2000. Without the policy, the total fertility rate and average daughter-to-son ratio would have been 2.2 and 0.9 in 2000. Instead, they were 1.5 and 0.8.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信