传统企业与创业企业的比较分析

T. Botello Velasto, J. González-Bueno
{"title":"传统企业与创业企业的比较分析","authors":"T. Botello Velasto, J. González-Bueno","doi":"10.46503/xfqz4008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional business companies and startups are decidedly different organizations. Each has what the other lacks. Traditional business company has the resources, scale, power and routines needed to execute a proven business model efficiently. Startup has none of that, but usually has promising ideas, organizational agility, willingness to take risks, and fast-growing aspirations. Considering the above introduced considerations, the aim and contribution of this paper is to make a comparative analysis between traditional business companies and startups.","PeriodicalId":438645,"journal":{"name":"Finance, Markets and Valuation","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis between traditional businesses and startups\",\"authors\":\"T. Botello Velasto, J. González-Bueno\",\"doi\":\"10.46503/xfqz4008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional business companies and startups are decidedly different organizations. Each has what the other lacks. Traditional business company has the resources, scale, power and routines needed to execute a proven business model efficiently. Startup has none of that, but usually has promising ideas, organizational agility, willingness to take risks, and fast-growing aspirations. Considering the above introduced considerations, the aim and contribution of this paper is to make a comparative analysis between traditional business companies and startups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance, Markets and Valuation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance, Markets and Valuation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46503/xfqz4008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance, Markets and Valuation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46503/xfqz4008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

传统的商业公司和创业公司显然是不同的组织。每个人都有对方所缺乏的。传统的商业公司拥有资源、规模、权力和流程,可以有效地执行一个经过验证的商业模式。创业公司没有这些,但通常有有前途的想法、组织敏捷性、愿意冒险和快速增长的抱负。综上所述,本文的目的和贡献在于对传统商业公司和创业公司进行比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis between traditional businesses and startups
Traditional business companies and startups are decidedly different organizations. Each has what the other lacks. Traditional business company has the resources, scale, power and routines needed to execute a proven business model efficiently. Startup has none of that, but usually has promising ideas, organizational agility, willingness to take risks, and fast-growing aspirations. Considering the above introduced considerations, the aim and contribution of this paper is to make a comparative analysis between traditional business companies and startups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信