{"title":"弱交变自动机简单地解释了为什么大多数时间和动态逻辑在指数时间内是可决定的","authors":"D. E. Muller, A. Saoudi, P. Schupp","doi":"10.1109/LICS.1988.5139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors give a very simple uniform explanation of the persistence of exponential decidability. They follow M. Vardi and P. Wolper's theory (1986) that given a formula gamma of a temporal or dynamic logic, it is important to construct an equivalent automation M/sub gamma /. They characterize the weak monadic theory of the tree; it turns out that weak alternating automata greatly simplify design procedures.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":425186,"journal":{"name":"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"130","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weak alternating automata give a simple explanation of why most temporal and dynamic logics are decidable in exponential time\",\"authors\":\"D. E. Muller, A. Saoudi, P. Schupp\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.1988.5139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors give a very simple uniform explanation of the persistence of exponential decidability. They follow M. Vardi and P. Wolper's theory (1986) that given a formula gamma of a temporal or dynamic logic, it is important to construct an equivalent automation M/sub gamma /. They characterize the weak monadic theory of the tree; it turns out that weak alternating automata greatly simplify design procedures.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":425186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"130\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1988.5139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1988.5139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Weak alternating automata give a simple explanation of why most temporal and dynamic logics are decidable in exponential time
The authors give a very simple uniform explanation of the persistence of exponential decidability. They follow M. Vardi and P. Wolper's theory (1986) that given a formula gamma of a temporal or dynamic logic, it is important to construct an equivalent automation M/sub gamma /. They characterize the weak monadic theory of the tree; it turns out that weak alternating automata greatly simplify design procedures.<>