改进油田开发计划的创新地层测试方法:东南亚的案例研究

Akira Nakatani, Anthony Cartwright, J. Copp, T. Khunaworawet, S. Daungkaew, L. Phan, V. Kieu, Jagdeve Babu H.
{"title":"改进油田开发计划的创新地层测试方法:东南亚的案例研究","authors":"Akira Nakatani, Anthony Cartwright, J. Copp, T. Khunaworawet, S. Daungkaew, L. Phan, V. Kieu, Jagdeve Babu H.","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23047-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In early 2010s, two gas and gas condensate fields were discovered in a South-East Asia Basin. The Field Development Plan (FDP) was approved to develop both. After drilling several wells, the operator encountered complex challenges: (1) lower permeability reservoirs (2) complex HPHT subsurface structures (3) fluid identification, (4) reservoir understanding and connectivity. Formation evaluation, especially formation testers were therefore crucial for better reservoir understanding, to de-risk the FDP and maximize future productivity of the field.\n This paper will discuss formation evaluation and formation testing in this campaign which consists of more than 10 jobs. Firstly, proper pre-job design and planning was done based on reservoir fluid information and reservoir properties from the previous exploration campaign. Analytical and numerical simulation models were conducted to properly design the Formation Tester (FT) tool string: probe/packer types, pump rate, and displacement unit types. Later, logging operation procedure, real time monitoring, and communication protocol will be also discussed with lessons learned and best practices. This workflow has set another milestone for fit-for-purpose solutions to tackle the reservoir and operational challenges.\n In this campaign, apart from a new discovery, based on Downhole Fluid Analyzer (DFA) technology, we surprisingly proved different fluids in the deeper reservoirs. In addition, we were able to address reservoir connectivity, the main uncertainty in their FDP. This paper also discusses several innovative methods associated with FT technology to reduce uncertainties in the FDP such as:\n The FT selection to help obtain best reservoir data, even in the most challenging environments such as low permeability, uncertain reservoir fluids, HPHT, and complex subsurface structure. As no well test was planned, Interval Pressure Transient Test (IPTT) data was used to obtain zone permeability which was later used to calibrate petrophysical data and the dynamic reservoir model. The use of pressure and DFA data to understand reservoir connectivity. The comparison between DFA data and PVT lab results will be also discussed. The use of advanced reservoir simulation software to understand reservoir contact uncertainty and improve reserve estimation.\n From this work, we have learnt that collaboration between different teams and disciplines is most important for this to be a smooth and seamless operation. Innovation and sustainability workflows are always possible to adapt in order to achieve good results even in the most challenging environments.","PeriodicalId":283978,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Formation Testing Methods to Enhance the Field Development Plan: a Case Study in South-East Asia\",\"authors\":\"Akira Nakatani, Anthony Cartwright, J. Copp, T. Khunaworawet, S. Daungkaew, L. Phan, V. Kieu, Jagdeve Babu H.\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-23047-ea\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In early 2010s, two gas and gas condensate fields were discovered in a South-East Asia Basin. The Field Development Plan (FDP) was approved to develop both. After drilling several wells, the operator encountered complex challenges: (1) lower permeability reservoirs (2) complex HPHT subsurface structures (3) fluid identification, (4) reservoir understanding and connectivity. Formation evaluation, especially formation testers were therefore crucial for better reservoir understanding, to de-risk the FDP and maximize future productivity of the field.\\n This paper will discuss formation evaluation and formation testing in this campaign which consists of more than 10 jobs. Firstly, proper pre-job design and planning was done based on reservoir fluid information and reservoir properties from the previous exploration campaign. Analytical and numerical simulation models were conducted to properly design the Formation Tester (FT) tool string: probe/packer types, pump rate, and displacement unit types. Later, logging operation procedure, real time monitoring, and communication protocol will be also discussed with lessons learned and best practices. This workflow has set another milestone for fit-for-purpose solutions to tackle the reservoir and operational challenges.\\n In this campaign, apart from a new discovery, based on Downhole Fluid Analyzer (DFA) technology, we surprisingly proved different fluids in the deeper reservoirs. In addition, we were able to address reservoir connectivity, the main uncertainty in their FDP. This paper also discusses several innovative methods associated with FT technology to reduce uncertainties in the FDP such as:\\n The FT selection to help obtain best reservoir data, even in the most challenging environments such as low permeability, uncertain reservoir fluids, HPHT, and complex subsurface structure. As no well test was planned, Interval Pressure Transient Test (IPTT) data was used to obtain zone permeability which was later used to calibrate petrophysical data and the dynamic reservoir model. The use of pressure and DFA data to understand reservoir connectivity. The comparison between DFA data and PVT lab results will be also discussed. The use of advanced reservoir simulation software to understand reservoir contact uncertainty and improve reserve estimation.\\n From this work, we have learnt that collaboration between different teams and disciplines is most important for this to be a smooth and seamless operation. Innovation and sustainability workflows are always possible to adapt in order to achieve good results even in the most challenging environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23047-ea\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23047-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2010年初,在东南亚盆地发现了两个天然气和凝析气田。油田开发计划(FDP)被批准开发这两个项目。在钻了几口井之后,作业者遇到了复杂的挑战:(1)低渗透储层;(2)复杂的高温高压地下构造;(3)流体识别;(4)储层认识和连通性。因此,地层评价,特别是地层测试对于更好地了解储层、降低FDP风险和最大化油田未来产能至关重要。本文将讨论这一由10多个作业组成的活动中的地层评价和地层测试。首先,根据之前勘探的储层流体信息和储层性质,进行了适当的作业前设计和规划。通过分析和数值模拟模型来合理设计地层测试器(FT)工具串:探头/封隔器类型、泵速和排量单元类型。随后,还将讨论日志操作流程、实时监控和通信协议,并结合经验教训和最佳实践进行讨论。该工作流程为解决油藏和作业挑战的专用解决方案树立了又一个里程碑。在本次活动中,除了基于井下流体分析仪(DFA)技术的新发现之外,我们还意外地在更深的储层中发现了不同的流体。此外,我们能够解决储层连通性问题,这是FDP的主要不确定因素。本文还讨论了与FT技术相关的几种创新方法,以减少FDP中的不确定性,例如:FT选择有助于获得最佳油藏数据,即使在最具挑战性的环境中,如低渗透率、不确定的油藏流体、高温高压和复杂的地下结构。由于没有计划进行试井,因此使用了段间压力瞬变测试(IPTT)数据来获取层间渗透率,然后使用这些数据来校准岩石物理数据和动态储层模型。利用压力和DFA数据来了解储层连通性。本文还将讨论DFA数据与PVT实验结果的比较。利用先进的油藏模拟软件了解油藏接触不确定性,改进储量估算。从这项工作中,我们了解到不同团队和学科之间的合作对于顺利无缝的运作是最重要的。即使在最具挑战性的环境中,创新和可持续性工作流程也总是可以适应的,以便取得良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative Formation Testing Methods to Enhance the Field Development Plan: a Case Study in South-East Asia
In early 2010s, two gas and gas condensate fields were discovered in a South-East Asia Basin. The Field Development Plan (FDP) was approved to develop both. After drilling several wells, the operator encountered complex challenges: (1) lower permeability reservoirs (2) complex HPHT subsurface structures (3) fluid identification, (4) reservoir understanding and connectivity. Formation evaluation, especially formation testers were therefore crucial for better reservoir understanding, to de-risk the FDP and maximize future productivity of the field. This paper will discuss formation evaluation and formation testing in this campaign which consists of more than 10 jobs. Firstly, proper pre-job design and planning was done based on reservoir fluid information and reservoir properties from the previous exploration campaign. Analytical and numerical simulation models were conducted to properly design the Formation Tester (FT) tool string: probe/packer types, pump rate, and displacement unit types. Later, logging operation procedure, real time monitoring, and communication protocol will be also discussed with lessons learned and best practices. This workflow has set another milestone for fit-for-purpose solutions to tackle the reservoir and operational challenges. In this campaign, apart from a new discovery, based on Downhole Fluid Analyzer (DFA) technology, we surprisingly proved different fluids in the deeper reservoirs. In addition, we were able to address reservoir connectivity, the main uncertainty in their FDP. This paper also discusses several innovative methods associated with FT technology to reduce uncertainties in the FDP such as: The FT selection to help obtain best reservoir data, even in the most challenging environments such as low permeability, uncertain reservoir fluids, HPHT, and complex subsurface structure. As no well test was planned, Interval Pressure Transient Test (IPTT) data was used to obtain zone permeability which was later used to calibrate petrophysical data and the dynamic reservoir model. The use of pressure and DFA data to understand reservoir connectivity. The comparison between DFA data and PVT lab results will be also discussed. The use of advanced reservoir simulation software to understand reservoir contact uncertainty and improve reserve estimation. From this work, we have learnt that collaboration between different teams and disciplines is most important for this to be a smooth and seamless operation. Innovation and sustainability workflows are always possible to adapt in order to achieve good results even in the most challenging environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信