地理社交网络中的位置隐私和效用:调查和研究挑战

Z. Riaz, Frank Dürr, K. Rothermel
{"title":"地理社交网络中的位置隐私和效用:调查和研究挑战","authors":"Z. Riaz, Frank Dürr, K. Rothermel","doi":"10.1109/PST.2018.8514193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Location information sharing on popular online social networking platforms like Facebook and Foursquare brings mutual benefits for the users of these platforms (e.g., free locationbased services) as well as the platform providers (e.g., locationbased businesses). An obvious problem however that impedes these mutual benefits are privacy concerns related to location data of users, which also curb their active participation. In this paper, we analyze the role of existing location privacypreserving mechanisms in minimizing this mutual loss of benefits. Our analysis reveals that most existing mechanisms either ignore social platform related user-privacy concerns or they disregard location data-quality related demands of the platform providers. Moreover, we also point out concrete research gaps and implementation issues related to existing privacy mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":265506,"journal":{"name":"2018 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Location Privacy and Utility in Geo-social Networks: Survey and Research Challenges\",\"authors\":\"Z. Riaz, Frank Dürr, K. Rothermel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PST.2018.8514193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Location information sharing on popular online social networking platforms like Facebook and Foursquare brings mutual benefits for the users of these platforms (e.g., free locationbased services) as well as the platform providers (e.g., locationbased businesses). An obvious problem however that impedes these mutual benefits are privacy concerns related to location data of users, which also curb their active participation. In this paper, we analyze the role of existing location privacypreserving mechanisms in minimizing this mutual loss of benefits. Our analysis reveals that most existing mechanisms either ignore social platform related user-privacy concerns or they disregard location data-quality related demands of the platform providers. Moreover, we also point out concrete research gaps and implementation issues related to existing privacy mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2018.8514193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2018.8514193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在Facebook和Foursquare等流行的在线社交网络平台上,位置信息共享为这些平台的用户(例如,免费的基于位置的服务)和平台提供商(例如,基于位置的企业)带来了互惠互利。然而,阻碍这些互惠互利的一个明显问题是与用户位置数据相关的隐私问题,这也限制了他们的积极参与。在本文中,我们分析了现有的位置隐私保护机制在最小化这种相互利益损失方面的作用。我们的分析表明,大多数现有机制要么忽视了与社交平台相关的用户隐私问题,要么忽视了平台提供商的位置数据质量相关需求。此外,我们还指出了与现有隐私机制相关的具体研究差距和实施问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Location Privacy and Utility in Geo-social Networks: Survey and Research Challenges
Location information sharing on popular online social networking platforms like Facebook and Foursquare brings mutual benefits for the users of these platforms (e.g., free locationbased services) as well as the platform providers (e.g., locationbased businesses). An obvious problem however that impedes these mutual benefits are privacy concerns related to location data of users, which also curb their active participation. In this paper, we analyze the role of existing location privacypreserving mechanisms in minimizing this mutual loss of benefits. Our analysis reveals that most existing mechanisms either ignore social platform related user-privacy concerns or they disregard location data-quality related demands of the platform providers. Moreover, we also point out concrete research gaps and implementation issues related to existing privacy mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信