从ResearchGate推荐科学合作

M. W. Rodrigues, Wladmir Cardoso Brandão, Luis E. Zárate
{"title":"从ResearchGate推荐科学合作","authors":"M. W. Rodrigues, Wladmir Cardoso Brandão, Luis E. Zárate","doi":"10.1109/BRACIS.2018.00065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific collaboration improves researchers productivity by providing a way to share new ideas, learn new techniques, and find new research applications, increasing the chance to access funding. Beyond ethics and reciprocity, there are other important aspects on achieving scientific collaborations, such as research interests and expected productivity gain, that are paramount to a successful partnership. However, achieve effective collaborations is a hard work and can drain researchers time. In this work, we propose a recommendation approach that uses different strategies to suggest scientific collaboration for researchers based on their research interest. In particular, our approach exploits ResearchGate, a well known research social network from where research interests and researchers production are used to model similarity between them. Experimental results show that the content-based strategy outperforms neighborhood-based collaborative filtering strategies to recommend scientific collaboration with gains of up 16.60% in precision, 37.19% in recall, and 21.16% in F1 for the top-20 recommendation lists.","PeriodicalId":405190,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommending Scientific Collaboration from ResearchGate\",\"authors\":\"M. W. Rodrigues, Wladmir Cardoso Brandão, Luis E. Zárate\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BRACIS.2018.00065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific collaboration improves researchers productivity by providing a way to share new ideas, learn new techniques, and find new research applications, increasing the chance to access funding. Beyond ethics and reciprocity, there are other important aspects on achieving scientific collaborations, such as research interests and expected productivity gain, that are paramount to a successful partnership. However, achieve effective collaborations is a hard work and can drain researchers time. In this work, we propose a recommendation approach that uses different strategies to suggest scientific collaboration for researchers based on their research interest. In particular, our approach exploits ResearchGate, a well known research social network from where research interests and researchers production are used to model similarity between them. Experimental results show that the content-based strategy outperforms neighborhood-based collaborative filtering strategies to recommend scientific collaboration with gains of up 16.60% in precision, 37.19% in recall, and 21.16% in F1 for the top-20 recommendation lists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2018.00065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2018.00065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

科学合作提供了一种分享新思想、学习新技术和发现新的研究应用的方式,从而提高了研究人员的生产力,增加了获得资助的机会。除了伦理和互惠之外,实现科学合作还有其他重要方面,例如研究兴趣和预期的生产力提高,这对于成功的伙伴关系至关重要。然而,实现有效的合作是一项艰巨的工作,可能会消耗研究人员的时间。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种推荐方法,根据研究人员的研究兴趣,使用不同的策略来建议他们进行科学合作。特别是,我们的方法利用了ResearchGate,这是一个著名的研究社交网络,研究兴趣和研究人员的成果被用来模拟它们之间的相似性。实验结果表明,基于内容的协同过滤策略在推荐科学协作方面优于基于邻居的协同过滤策略,在推荐前20名列表上,准确率提高了16.60%,召回率提高了37.19%,F1提高了21.16%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommending Scientific Collaboration from ResearchGate
Scientific collaboration improves researchers productivity by providing a way to share new ideas, learn new techniques, and find new research applications, increasing the chance to access funding. Beyond ethics and reciprocity, there are other important aspects on achieving scientific collaborations, such as research interests and expected productivity gain, that are paramount to a successful partnership. However, achieve effective collaborations is a hard work and can drain researchers time. In this work, we propose a recommendation approach that uses different strategies to suggest scientific collaboration for researchers based on their research interest. In particular, our approach exploits ResearchGate, a well known research social network from where research interests and researchers production are used to model similarity between them. Experimental results show that the content-based strategy outperforms neighborhood-based collaborative filtering strategies to recommend scientific collaboration with gains of up 16.60% in precision, 37.19% in recall, and 21.16% in F1 for the top-20 recommendation lists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信