作为团队的一部分有效地工作

D. Metcalfe, Harveer Dev
{"title":"作为团队的一部分有效地工作","authors":"D. Metcalfe, Harveer Dev","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198805809.003.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teamworking is an inevitable part of working within a complex multidisciplinary environment. Thankfully, most interactions with other members of the healthcare team will be positive and constructive. Unfortunately, such happy circumstances do not make for particularly interesting SJT scenarios. The following section is therefore full of colleagues that are angry, rude, dishonest, unprofessional, and even intoxicated. In Raising and Acting on Concerns About Patient Safety (2012), the General Medical Council (GMC) states that ‘all doctors have a duty to raise concerns where they believe that patient safety or care is being compromised by the practice of colleagues or the systems, policies and procedures in the organizations in which they work’. The GMC proposes taking the following steps in sequence when you develop serious concerns about a colleague: ● Raise the concern with ‘your manager or an appropriate officer of the organisation . . . such as the consultant in charge of the team, the clinical or medical director’. Alternatively, a foundation doctor may raise their concern with an appropriate person responsible for training such as their Foundation Programme Director. ● Raise the concern with a regulator (such as the GMC), professional body (such as the British Medical Association), or charity (such as Public Concern at Work). This step should be taken if you have exhausted options for raising the concern internally and there is an ‘immediate serious risk to patients, and a regulator or other external body has responsibility to act or intervene’. ● Raise the concern publicly. This step should be taken when you have exhausted options for raising the concern internally and have ‘good reason to believe that patients are still at risk of harm’. Your usual duty is to avoid breaching patient confidentiality. This is a highly unusual and significant step to take and is unlikely to be appropriate without first having taken advice from an appropriate organization such as the GMC, BMA, or Public Concern at Work. The questions within this section highlight your ability and willingness to work with team members. You will need to work collaboratively and respectfully within a multi- disciplinary team, as well as provide advice and support to colleagues.","PeriodicalId":165468,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Assess and Progress: Situational Judgement Test","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working Effectively as Part of a Team\",\"authors\":\"D. Metcalfe, Harveer Dev\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198805809.003.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teamworking is an inevitable part of working within a complex multidisciplinary environment. Thankfully, most interactions with other members of the healthcare team will be positive and constructive. Unfortunately, such happy circumstances do not make for particularly interesting SJT scenarios. The following section is therefore full of colleagues that are angry, rude, dishonest, unprofessional, and even intoxicated. In Raising and Acting on Concerns About Patient Safety (2012), the General Medical Council (GMC) states that ‘all doctors have a duty to raise concerns where they believe that patient safety or care is being compromised by the practice of colleagues or the systems, policies and procedures in the organizations in which they work’. The GMC proposes taking the following steps in sequence when you develop serious concerns about a colleague: ● Raise the concern with ‘your manager or an appropriate officer of the organisation . . . such as the consultant in charge of the team, the clinical or medical director’. Alternatively, a foundation doctor may raise their concern with an appropriate person responsible for training such as their Foundation Programme Director. ● Raise the concern with a regulator (such as the GMC), professional body (such as the British Medical Association), or charity (such as Public Concern at Work). This step should be taken if you have exhausted options for raising the concern internally and there is an ‘immediate serious risk to patients, and a regulator or other external body has responsibility to act or intervene’. ● Raise the concern publicly. This step should be taken when you have exhausted options for raising the concern internally and have ‘good reason to believe that patients are still at risk of harm’. Your usual duty is to avoid breaching patient confidentiality. This is a highly unusual and significant step to take and is unlikely to be appropriate without first having taken advice from an appropriate organization such as the GMC, BMA, or Public Concern at Work. The questions within this section highlight your ability and willingness to work with team members. You will need to work collaboratively and respectfully within a multi- disciplinary team, as well as provide advice and support to colleagues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Assess and Progress: Situational Judgement Test\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Assess and Progress: Situational Judgement Test\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805809.003.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Assess and Progress: Situational Judgement Test","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805809.003.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在复杂的多学科环境中,团队合作是不可避免的一部分。值得庆幸的是,与医疗团队其他成员的大多数互动将是积极和建设性的。不幸的是,这种令人愉快的环境并不能产生特别有趣的SJT场景。因此,接下来的部分充满了愤怒,粗鲁,不诚实,不专业,甚至醉酒的同事。在《对患者安全的担忧提出并采取行动》(2012)中,英国医学总委员会(GMC)指出,“所有医生都有责任提出担忧,如果他们认为患者的安全或护理受到同事的做法或他们所在组织的系统、政策和程序的损害”。GMC建议,当你对某位同事产生严重担忧时,按顺序采取以下步骤:●向“你的经理或组织的相关官员”提出担忧……比如负责团队的顾问、临床或医疗主任。或者,基金会医生可以向负责培训的适当人员(如基金会项目主任)提出他们的担忧。向监管机构(如GMC)、专业机构(如英国医学协会)或慈善机构(如公共关注组织)提出关注。如果您已经用尽了内部提出关注的选择,并且“对患者存在直接的严重风险,监管机构或其他外部机构有责任采取行动或干预”,则应采取这一步骤。●公开提出关注。当你已经用尽了在内部提出关注的选择,并且有“充分的理由相信患者仍有受到伤害的风险”时,应该采取这一步骤。你的职责是避免泄露病人的隐私。这是一个非常不寻常和重要的步骤,如果没有首先听取适当组织的建议,如GMC、BMA或公共关注工作,这是不太可能合适的。这部分的问题突出了你与团队成员合作的能力和意愿。你需要在一个多学科的团队中相互协作和尊重,并为同事提供建议和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working Effectively as Part of a Team
Teamworking is an inevitable part of working within a complex multidisciplinary environment. Thankfully, most interactions with other members of the healthcare team will be positive and constructive. Unfortunately, such happy circumstances do not make for particularly interesting SJT scenarios. The following section is therefore full of colleagues that are angry, rude, dishonest, unprofessional, and even intoxicated. In Raising and Acting on Concerns About Patient Safety (2012), the General Medical Council (GMC) states that ‘all doctors have a duty to raise concerns where they believe that patient safety or care is being compromised by the practice of colleagues or the systems, policies and procedures in the organizations in which they work’. The GMC proposes taking the following steps in sequence when you develop serious concerns about a colleague: ● Raise the concern with ‘your manager or an appropriate officer of the organisation . . . such as the consultant in charge of the team, the clinical or medical director’. Alternatively, a foundation doctor may raise their concern with an appropriate person responsible for training such as their Foundation Programme Director. ● Raise the concern with a regulator (such as the GMC), professional body (such as the British Medical Association), or charity (such as Public Concern at Work). This step should be taken if you have exhausted options for raising the concern internally and there is an ‘immediate serious risk to patients, and a regulator or other external body has responsibility to act or intervene’. ● Raise the concern publicly. This step should be taken when you have exhausted options for raising the concern internally and have ‘good reason to believe that patients are still at risk of harm’. Your usual duty is to avoid breaching patient confidentiality. This is a highly unusual and significant step to take and is unlikely to be appropriate without first having taken advice from an appropriate organization such as the GMC, BMA, or Public Concern at Work. The questions within this section highlight your ability and willingness to work with team members. You will need to work collaboratively and respectfully within a multi- disciplinary team, as well as provide advice and support to colleagues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信