COSECSA地区外科医生使用渐进式压迫疗法:一项横断面研究

B. M. Ndeleva, K. Lakati
{"title":"COSECSA地区外科医生使用渐进式压迫疗法:一项横断面研究","authors":"B. M. Ndeleva, K. Lakati","doi":"10.4314/ECAJS.V23I1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated that graduated compression therapy (GCT) is efficacious in the management of venous disorders, as well as in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). \nThis study aimed to delineate GCT usage by surgeons in the region served by the College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA). \nMethods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among surgeons attending the 17th COSECSA Annual Scientific Conference in Mombasa, Kenya, between 7 and 10 December 2016. Only surgeons practising in the COSECSA region were included. Participation was voluntary, and those who consented were asked to complete a pretested questionnaire. \nResults: Ninety-four surgeons of various specialities submitted complete questionnaires. General and orthopaedic surgeons (48% and 30% of respondents, respectively) saw the most patients with venous disorders and patients at risk of VTE. Considering the mean number of patients seen, respondents prescribed GCT infrequently. Orthopaedic surgeons were the least likely to report having prescribed GCT for patients who might have benefited from such therapy, only doing so 15% of the time. The commonest indications for GCT prescription were varicose veins and VTE prophylaxis. The most commonly reported challenge was availability. No respondent reported experience with serious adverse events associated with GCT, such as limb ischaemia or nerve injury. A majority of the surgeons (58%) reported that GCT is effective for the prevention of VTE as well as the treatment of various venous disorders. \nConclusions: GCT is widely accepted as a useful tool in the prevention of VTE and management of various venous disorders among surgeons in the COSECSA region. However, GCT usage is low, owing to challenges such as availability. \nhttps://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ecajs.v23i1.3 \n  \nThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source (including a link to the formal publication), provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.","PeriodicalId":302666,"journal":{"name":"East and Central African Journal of Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graduated compression therapy usage among surgeons in the COSECSA region: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"B. M. Ndeleva, K. Lakati\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ECAJS.V23I1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated that graduated compression therapy (GCT) is efficacious in the management of venous disorders, as well as in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). \\nThis study aimed to delineate GCT usage by surgeons in the region served by the College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA). \\nMethods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among surgeons attending the 17th COSECSA Annual Scientific Conference in Mombasa, Kenya, between 7 and 10 December 2016. Only surgeons practising in the COSECSA region were included. Participation was voluntary, and those who consented were asked to complete a pretested questionnaire. \\nResults: Ninety-four surgeons of various specialities submitted complete questionnaires. General and orthopaedic surgeons (48% and 30% of respondents, respectively) saw the most patients with venous disorders and patients at risk of VTE. Considering the mean number of patients seen, respondents prescribed GCT infrequently. Orthopaedic surgeons were the least likely to report having prescribed GCT for patients who might have benefited from such therapy, only doing so 15% of the time. The commonest indications for GCT prescription were varicose veins and VTE prophylaxis. The most commonly reported challenge was availability. No respondent reported experience with serious adverse events associated with GCT, such as limb ischaemia or nerve injury. A majority of the surgeons (58%) reported that GCT is effective for the prevention of VTE as well as the treatment of various venous disorders. \\nConclusions: GCT is widely accepted as a useful tool in the prevention of VTE and management of various venous disorders among surgeons in the COSECSA region. However, GCT usage is low, owing to challenges such as availability. \\nhttps://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ecajs.v23i1.3 \\n  \\nThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source (including a link to the formal publication), provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East and Central African Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East and Central African Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ECAJS.V23I1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East and Central African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ECAJS.V23I1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大量研究表明,渐进式压迫治疗(GCT)在静脉疾病的治疗以及静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的预防方面是有效的。本研究旨在描述东非、中非和南非外科医生学院(COSECSA)所服务地区的外科医生对GCT的使用情况。方法:我们对参加2016年12月7日至10日在肯尼亚蒙巴萨举行的第17届COSECSA年度科学会议的外科医生进行了横断面研究。仅包括在COSECSA地区执业的外科医生。参与是自愿的,那些同意的人被要求完成一份预先测试的问卷。结果:94名不同专科的外科医生填写了完整的问卷。普通外科医生和骨科医生(分别占受访者的48%和30%)看到的静脉疾病患者和有静脉血栓栓塞风险的患者最多。考虑到所见患者的平均数量,受访者很少开GCT。骨科医生最不可能报告说,他们给可能从这种治疗中受益的患者开了GCT处方,只有15%的时间这样做。GCT处方最常见的适应症是静脉曲张和静脉血栓栓塞预防。最常见的挑战是可用性。没有应答者报告与GCT相关的严重不良事件,如肢体缺血或神经损伤。大多数外科医生(58%)报告说,GCT对预防静脉血栓栓塞和治疗各种静脉疾病有效。结论:在COSECSA地区的外科医生中,GCT被广泛接受为预防静脉血栓栓塞和治疗各种静脉疾病的有用工具。然而,由于可用性等挑战,GCT的使用率很低。https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ecajs.v23i1.3本作品遵循知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议,允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是您要适当注明原作者和来源(包括正式出版物的链接),提供知识共享许可协议的链接,并注明是否进行了更改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Graduated compression therapy usage among surgeons in the COSECSA region: A cross-sectional study
Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated that graduated compression therapy (GCT) is efficacious in the management of venous disorders, as well as in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aimed to delineate GCT usage by surgeons in the region served by the College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among surgeons attending the 17th COSECSA Annual Scientific Conference in Mombasa, Kenya, between 7 and 10 December 2016. Only surgeons practising in the COSECSA region were included. Participation was voluntary, and those who consented were asked to complete a pretested questionnaire. Results: Ninety-four surgeons of various specialities submitted complete questionnaires. General and orthopaedic surgeons (48% and 30% of respondents, respectively) saw the most patients with venous disorders and patients at risk of VTE. Considering the mean number of patients seen, respondents prescribed GCT infrequently. Orthopaedic surgeons were the least likely to report having prescribed GCT for patients who might have benefited from such therapy, only doing so 15% of the time. The commonest indications for GCT prescription were varicose veins and VTE prophylaxis. The most commonly reported challenge was availability. No respondent reported experience with serious adverse events associated with GCT, such as limb ischaemia or nerve injury. A majority of the surgeons (58%) reported that GCT is effective for the prevention of VTE as well as the treatment of various venous disorders. Conclusions: GCT is widely accepted as a useful tool in the prevention of VTE and management of various venous disorders among surgeons in the COSECSA region. However, GCT usage is low, owing to challenges such as availability. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ecajs.v23i1.3   This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source (including a link to the formal publication), provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信