正午为计时标准

C. Curry
{"title":"正午为计时标准","authors":"C. Curry","doi":"10.1049/CE:20060302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses an ongoing debate as to which standard will predominate the next generation networks (NGN). On the one hand sits the Geneva-based International Telecommunications Union (ITU), while on the other is the Institution of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). At the heart of the debate is how the information relating to telecom traffic's relative position and speed is passed from one network node to another. In the meantime, both wireline and wireless carriers are expected to wait as alternative solutions vie for acceptance and adoption.","PeriodicalId":371133,"journal":{"name":"Communications Engineer","volume":"09 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High noon for timing standards\",\"authors\":\"C. Curry\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/CE:20060302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses an ongoing debate as to which standard will predominate the next generation networks (NGN). On the one hand sits the Geneva-based International Telecommunications Union (ITU), while on the other is the Institution of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). At the heart of the debate is how the information relating to telecom traffic's relative position and speed is passed from one network node to another. In the meantime, both wireline and wireless carriers are expected to wait as alternative solutions vie for acceptance and adoption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Engineer\",\"volume\":\"09 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Engineer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/CE:20060302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Engineer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/CE:20060302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了一个正在进行的争论,即哪个标准将主导下一代网络(NGN)。一方面是总部设在日内瓦的国际电信联盟(ITU),另一方面是电气和电子工程师协会(IEEE)。争论的核心是与电信流量的相对位置和速度有关的信息如何从一个网络节点传递到另一个网络节点。与此同时,有线和无线运营商都希望等待替代解决方案的接受和采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High noon for timing standards
This paper discusses an ongoing debate as to which standard will predominate the next generation networks (NGN). On the one hand sits the Geneva-based International Telecommunications Union (ITU), while on the other is the Institution of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). At the heart of the debate is how the information relating to telecom traffic's relative position and speed is passed from one network node to another. In the meantime, both wireline and wireless carriers are expected to wait as alternative solutions vie for acceptance and adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信