R(关于Cart的应用)诉高级法庭[2011]UKSC 28，最高法院

Essential Cases: Public Law Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1093/he/9780191842832.003.0033

T. Webb

{"title":"R(关于Cart的应用)诉高级法庭[2011]UKSC 28，最高法院","authors":"T. Webb","doi":"10.1093/he/9780191842832.003.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Essential Cases: Public Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, Supreme Court. This case examined the circumstances under which the Upper Tribunal would be subject to judicial review. There is also some discussion of ouster clauses. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Thomas Webb.","PeriodicalId":299991,"journal":{"name":"Essential Cases: Public Law","volume":"2674 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, Supreme Court\",\"authors\":\"T. Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/he/9780191842832.003.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Essential Cases: Public Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, Supreme Court. This case examined the circumstances under which the Upper Tribunal would be subject to judicial review. There is also some discussion of ouster clauses. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Thomas Webb.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Essential Cases: Public Law\",\"volume\":\"2674 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Essential Cases: Public Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780191842832.003.0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essential Cases: Public Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780191842832.003.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关键案例:公法在课程教材和关键案例判决之间架起了一座桥梁。本案例文件总结了R(关于Cart的适用)诉高级法庭[2011]UKSC 28，最高法院的事实和决定。这个案件审查了高级法庭将受到司法审查的情况。也有一些关于财产侵占条款的讨论。该文件还包括作者托马斯·韦伯的支持性评论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, Supreme Court

Essential Cases: Public Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, Supreme Court. This case examined the circumstances under which the Upper Tribunal would be subject to judicial review. There is also some discussion of ouster clauses. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Thomas Webb.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Essential Cases: Public Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量