太简单了吗?在基于维护的编程工具研究中使用的任务复杂性概念

Patrick Rein, Tom Beckmann, Eva Krebs, Toni Mattis, R. Hirschfeld
{"title":"太简单了吗?在基于维护的编程工具研究中使用的任务复杂性概念","authors":"Patrick Rein, Tom Beckmann, Eva Krebs, Toni Mattis, R. Hirschfeld","doi":"10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers conducting studies on programming tools often make use of maintenance tasks. The complexity of these tasks can significantly influence how participants behave. At the same time, the complexity of tasks is difficult to pinpoint due to the many sources of complexity for maintenance tasks. As a result, researchers may struggle to deliberately decide in which regard their tasks should be complex and in which regard they should be simple.To help researchers deliberately influence task complexity, we discuss different factors of task complexity. We draw these factors from 23 selected and 39 surveyed studies on programming tools. We arrange the factors according to a task complexity model from ergonomics research that we adapt for maintenance tasks. We illustrate the application of the factors through an example critique of a task design. In the end, task complexity might always be too complex to be fully controlled. Nevertheless, we hope that our discussion helps other researchers to decide in which dimensions their tasks are complex and in which dimensions they want to keep them simple.","PeriodicalId":376593,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too Simple? Notions of Task Complexity used in Maintenance-based Studies of Programming Tools\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Rein, Tom Beckmann, Eva Krebs, Toni Mattis, R. Hirschfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers conducting studies on programming tools often make use of maintenance tasks. The complexity of these tasks can significantly influence how participants behave. At the same time, the complexity of tasks is difficult to pinpoint due to the many sources of complexity for maintenance tasks. As a result, researchers may struggle to deliberately decide in which regard their tasks should be complex and in which regard they should be simple.To help researchers deliberately influence task complexity, we discuss different factors of task complexity. We draw these factors from 23 selected and 39 surveyed studies on programming tools. We arrange the factors according to a task complexity model from ergonomics research that we adapt for maintenance tasks. We illustrate the application of the factors through an example critique of a task design. In the end, task complexity might always be too complex to be fully controlled. Nevertheless, we hope that our discussion helps other researchers to decide in which dimensions their tasks are complex and in which dimensions they want to keep them simple.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对编程工具进行研究的研究人员经常使用维护任务。这些任务的复杂性会显著影响参与者的行为。同时,由于维护任务的复杂性有许多来源,任务的复杂性很难精确地确定。因此,研究人员可能很难有意识地决定他们的任务在哪些方面应该是复杂的,在哪些方面应该是简单的。为了帮助研究者有意识地影响任务复杂性,我们讨论了任务复杂性的不同因素。我们从23个选定的和39个调查的编程工具研究中得出这些因素。我们根据人类工效学研究中提出的任务复杂度模型,对维修任务的影响因素进行排序。我们通过一个任务设计的例子来说明这些因素的应用。最后,任务复杂性可能总是太复杂而无法完全控制。尽管如此,我们希望我们的讨论能够帮助其他研究人员决定他们的任务在哪些方面是复杂的,在哪些方面他们希望保持简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Too Simple? Notions of Task Complexity used in Maintenance-based Studies of Programming Tools
Researchers conducting studies on programming tools often make use of maintenance tasks. The complexity of these tasks can significantly influence how participants behave. At the same time, the complexity of tasks is difficult to pinpoint due to the many sources of complexity for maintenance tasks. As a result, researchers may struggle to deliberately decide in which regard their tasks should be complex and in which regard they should be simple.To help researchers deliberately influence task complexity, we discuss different factors of task complexity. We draw these factors from 23 selected and 39 surveyed studies on programming tools. We arrange the factors according to a task complexity model from ergonomics research that we adapt for maintenance tasks. We illustrate the application of the factors through an example critique of a task design. In the end, task complexity might always be too complex to be fully controlled. Nevertheless, we hope that our discussion helps other researchers to decide in which dimensions their tasks are complex and in which dimensions they want to keep them simple.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信