{"title":"“结构倾角一致性”参数","authors":"M. R. Manzini, Ludovico Franco","doi":"10.1075/LI.00030.MAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We consider two sets of facts. The first is that dom\n objects may or may not agree with perfect participles in Indo-Aryan. The second\n is that (pseudo)partitive subjects may agree with the verb in the plural or not.\n We account for the dom parameter, basing on the assumption that\n dom corresponds to embedding of a DP under an oblique adposition:\n if P projects, the dom object is labelled PP and does not agree; if D\n projects, it is labelled DP, projecting like any other DP. On the contrary,\n inherent datives, where P/K is lexically selected, must project P/K and are\n therefore not goals for Agree. We extend this labelling account to\n (pseudo)partitives, as well as to optionally agreeing oblique clitics in\n Romance.","PeriodicalId":187045,"journal":{"name":"Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Agreement of structural obliques’\\n parameter\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Manzini, Ludovico Franco\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LI.00030.MAN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We consider two sets of facts. The first is that dom\\n objects may or may not agree with perfect participles in Indo-Aryan. The second\\n is that (pseudo)partitive subjects may agree with the verb in the plural or not.\\n We account for the dom parameter, basing on the assumption that\\n dom corresponds to embedding of a DP under an oblique adposition:\\n if P projects, the dom object is labelled PP and does not agree; if D\\n projects, it is labelled DP, projecting like any other DP. On the contrary,\\n inherent datives, where P/K is lexically selected, must project P/K and are\\n therefore not goals for Agree. We extend this labelling account to\\n (pseudo)partitives, as well as to optionally agreeing oblique clitics in\\n Romance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LI.00030.MAN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LI.00030.MAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We consider two sets of facts. The first is that dom
objects may or may not agree with perfect participles in Indo-Aryan. The second
is that (pseudo)partitive subjects may agree with the verb in the plural or not.
We account for the dom parameter, basing on the assumption that
dom corresponds to embedding of a DP under an oblique adposition:
if P projects, the dom object is labelled PP and does not agree; if D
projects, it is labelled DP, projecting like any other DP. On the contrary,
inherent datives, where P/K is lexically selected, must project P/K and are
therefore not goals for Agree. We extend this labelling account to
(pseudo)partitives, as well as to optionally agreeing oblique clitics in
Romance.