假的关注

In Commons Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35483/acsa.am.111.45
M. Jefferson
{"title":"假的关注","authors":"M. Jefferson","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.111.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rather than taking a techno-positivist position on the digital, computation might be approached critically as a medium with the capacity to affect, manage, and disrupt. Within this context, architectural applications of machine learning might productively agitate the stability of our defined disciplinary conventions (particularly in relationship to methods of production motivated by typology). These moments of friction where conventions come into contact with external systems of AI technology are explored. This paper proposes to fold these tendencies back into the way we think about making architecture; back into our processes and pedagogies to develop a reciprocal and discursive relationship with technology. By leaving space to foster attention, the paper’s mission is to develop skills that allow us to see the world anew and to become aware of the coded ways in which both technologies and the physical stuff of the world are motivated by hidden systems and to open up new frameworks for reconstructing our existing practices and conventions.","PeriodicalId":243862,"journal":{"name":"In Commons","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fake Attention\",\"authors\":\"M. Jefferson\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.am.111.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rather than taking a techno-positivist position on the digital, computation might be approached critically as a medium with the capacity to affect, manage, and disrupt. Within this context, architectural applications of machine learning might productively agitate the stability of our defined disciplinary conventions (particularly in relationship to methods of production motivated by typology). These moments of friction where conventions come into contact with external systems of AI technology are explored. This paper proposes to fold these tendencies back into the way we think about making architecture; back into our processes and pedagogies to develop a reciprocal and discursive relationship with technology. By leaving space to foster attention, the paper’s mission is to develop skills that allow us to see the world anew and to become aware of the coded ways in which both technologies and the physical stuff of the world are motivated by hidden systems and to open up new frameworks for reconstructing our existing practices and conventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Commons\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Commons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其对数字采取技术实证主义的立场,不如批判性地将计算视为一种具有影响、管理和破坏能力的媒介。在这种背景下,机器学习的建筑应用可能会有效地动摇我们定义的学科惯例的稳定性(特别是在与类型学驱动的生产方法的关系中)。在这些摩擦时刻,惯例与人工智能技术的外部系统发生了接触。本文建议将这些趋势重新纳入我们思考建筑的方式;回到我们的过程和教学方法,发展与技术的互惠和话语关系。通过留下空间来培养注意力,本文的使命是培养技能,使我们能够重新看待世界,并意识到技术和世界的物质物质都是由隐藏系统驱动的编码方式,并为重建我们现有的实践和惯例开辟新的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fake Attention
Rather than taking a techno-positivist position on the digital, computation might be approached critically as a medium with the capacity to affect, manage, and disrupt. Within this context, architectural applications of machine learning might productively agitate the stability of our defined disciplinary conventions (particularly in relationship to methods of production motivated by typology). These moments of friction where conventions come into contact with external systems of AI technology are explored. This paper proposes to fold these tendencies back into the way we think about making architecture; back into our processes and pedagogies to develop a reciprocal and discursive relationship with technology. By leaving space to foster attention, the paper’s mission is to develop skills that allow us to see the world anew and to become aware of the coded ways in which both technologies and the physical stuff of the world are motivated by hidden systems and to open up new frameworks for reconstructing our existing practices and conventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信