{"title":"时态DBMS体系结构的比较研究","authors":"C. Vassilakis, P. Georgiadis, A. Sotiropoulou","doi":"10.1109/DEXA.1996.558289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past few years, a number of implementations of temporal DBMSs has been reported. Most of these implementations share a common feature, which is that they have been built as an extension to a snapshot DBMS. The authors present three alternative design approaches that can be used for extending a snapshot DBMS to support temporal data, and evaluate the suitability of each approach, with respect to a number of design objectives.","PeriodicalId":438695,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications: DEXA 96","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of temporal DBMS architectures\",\"authors\":\"C. Vassilakis, P. Georgiadis, A. Sotiropoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DEXA.1996.558289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past few years, a number of implementations of temporal DBMSs has been reported. Most of these implementations share a common feature, which is that they have been built as an extension to a snapshot DBMS. The authors present three alternative design approaches that can be used for extending a snapshot DBMS to support temporal data, and evaluate the suitability of each approach, with respect to a number of design objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications: DEXA 96\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications: DEXA 96\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.1996.558289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications: DEXA 96","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.1996.558289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of temporal DBMS architectures
In the past few years, a number of implementations of temporal DBMSs has been reported. Most of these implementations share a common feature, which is that they have been built as an extension to a snapshot DBMS. The authors present three alternative design approaches that can be used for extending a snapshot DBMS to support temporal data, and evaluate the suitability of each approach, with respect to a number of design objectives.