{"title":"考虑用户中断成本的带子馈线实际配电网可靠性优化配电自动化装置配置","authors":"Jabulani Masimula, K. Awodele","doi":"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents predictive analytical and simulation approaches to reliability worth/cost assessments conducted on a test system and a typical Cape Town real system. Feeder 3 of bus 6 of the RBTS was utilized to illustrate various cases of switch configurations and for each arrangement the reliability indices were evaluated analytically as well as in Monte Carlo Simulation and results found to be similar. In this paper three scenarios were investigated in the Waterkloof Farmers-1 11 kV network (real system); Reliability assessment was firstly performed without automation devices (Scenario 1), secondly with automation devices in the current or existing positions (Scenario 2) and lastly, with optimal placement of the automation devices on the feeder using analytical and evolutionary algorithms methodologies (Scenario 3). The objective function behind placement can either be based on SAIDI or the ECOST and the best switch position for SAIDI might be worst position for the ECOST.","PeriodicalId":344332,"journal":{"name":"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)","volume":"25 11-12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Distribution Automation Devices Placement for Reliability Improvement of a Real Distribution Network with Sub-Feeders Considering Customer Interruption Cost\",\"authors\":\"Jabulani Masimula, K. Awodele\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents predictive analytical and simulation approaches to reliability worth/cost assessments conducted on a test system and a typical Cape Town real system. Feeder 3 of bus 6 of the RBTS was utilized to illustrate various cases of switch configurations and for each arrangement the reliability indices were evaluated analytically as well as in Monte Carlo Simulation and results found to be similar. In this paper three scenarios were investigated in the Waterkloof Farmers-1 11 kV network (real system); Reliability assessment was firstly performed without automation devices (Scenario 1), secondly with automation devices in the current or existing positions (Scenario 2) and lastly, with optimal placement of the automation devices on the feeder using analytical and evolutionary algorithms methodologies (Scenario 3). The objective function behind placement can either be based on SAIDI or the ECOST and the best switch position for SAIDI might be worst position for the ECOST.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)\",\"volume\":\"25 11-12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Distribution Automation Devices Placement for Reliability Improvement of a Real Distribution Network with Sub-Feeders Considering Customer Interruption Cost
This paper presents predictive analytical and simulation approaches to reliability worth/cost assessments conducted on a test system and a typical Cape Town real system. Feeder 3 of bus 6 of the RBTS was utilized to illustrate various cases of switch configurations and for each arrangement the reliability indices were evaluated analytically as well as in Monte Carlo Simulation and results found to be similar. In this paper three scenarios were investigated in the Waterkloof Farmers-1 11 kV network (real system); Reliability assessment was firstly performed without automation devices (Scenario 1), secondly with automation devices in the current or existing positions (Scenario 2) and lastly, with optimal placement of the automation devices on the feeder using analytical and evolutionary algorithms methodologies (Scenario 3). The objective function behind placement can either be based on SAIDI or the ECOST and the best switch position for SAIDI might be worst position for the ECOST.