AccTEF:基于本体系统的透明度和问责性评估框架

M. Basereh, A. Caputo, R. Brennan
{"title":"AccTEF:基于本体系统的透明度和问责性评估框架","authors":"M. Basereh, A. Caputo, R. Brennan","doi":"10.1142/s1793351x22400013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a new accountability and transparency evaluation framework (AccTEF) for ontology-based systems (OSysts). AccTEF is based on an analysis of the relation between a set of widely accepted data governance principles, i.e. findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable (FAIR) and accountability and transparency concepts. The evaluation of accountability and transparency of input ontologies and vocabularies of OSysts are addressed by analyzing the relation between vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation metrics, FAIR and accountability and transparency concepts. An ontology-based knowledge extraction pipeline is used as a use case in this study. Discovering the relation between FAIR and accountability and transparency helps in identifying and mitigating risks associated with deploying OSysts. This also allows providing design guidelines that help accountability and transparency to be embedded in OSysts. We found that FAIR can be used as a transparency indicator. We also found that the studied vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation metrics do not cover FAIR, accountability and transparency. Accordingly, we suggest these concepts should be considered as vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation aspects. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the relation between FAIR and accountability and transparency concepts has been found and used for evaluation.","PeriodicalId":217956,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Semantic Comput.","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AccTEF: A Transparency and Accountability Evaluation Framework for Ontology-Based Systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Basereh, A. Caputo, R. Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s1793351x22400013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a new accountability and transparency evaluation framework (AccTEF) for ontology-based systems (OSysts). AccTEF is based on an analysis of the relation between a set of widely accepted data governance principles, i.e. findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable (FAIR) and accountability and transparency concepts. The evaluation of accountability and transparency of input ontologies and vocabularies of OSysts are addressed by analyzing the relation between vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation metrics, FAIR and accountability and transparency concepts. An ontology-based knowledge extraction pipeline is used as a use case in this study. Discovering the relation between FAIR and accountability and transparency helps in identifying and mitigating risks associated with deploying OSysts. This also allows providing design guidelines that help accountability and transparency to be embedded in OSysts. We found that FAIR can be used as a transparency indicator. We also found that the studied vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation metrics do not cover FAIR, accountability and transparency. Accordingly, we suggest these concepts should be considered as vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation aspects. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the relation between FAIR and accountability and transparency concepts has been found and used for evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Semantic Comput.\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Semantic Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793351x22400013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Semantic Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793351x22400013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一种新的基于本体系统(osystems)的问责性和透明度评估框架(AccTEF)。AccTEF基于对一组广泛接受的数据治理原则(即可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重用(FAIR))与问责制和透明度概念之间关系的分析。通过分析词汇与本体质量评价指标、公平与问责制和透明度概念之间的关系,解决了系统输入本体和词汇的问责制和透明度评价问题。本研究以基于本体的知识抽取管道作为用例。发现公平与问责制和透明度之间的关系有助于识别和减轻与部署操作系统相关的风险。这也允许提供设计指南,帮助问责制和透明度嵌入到操作系统中。我们发现FAIR可以作为一个透明度指标。我们还发现,所研究的词汇和本体质量评估指标没有涵盖公平、问责制和透明度。因此,我们建议将这些概念作为词汇和本体质量的评价方面。据我们所知,这是第一次发现公平与问责制和透明度概念之间的关系,并将其用于评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AccTEF: A Transparency and Accountability Evaluation Framework for Ontology-Based Systems
This paper proposes a new accountability and transparency evaluation framework (AccTEF) for ontology-based systems (OSysts). AccTEF is based on an analysis of the relation between a set of widely accepted data governance principles, i.e. findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable (FAIR) and accountability and transparency concepts. The evaluation of accountability and transparency of input ontologies and vocabularies of OSysts are addressed by analyzing the relation between vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation metrics, FAIR and accountability and transparency concepts. An ontology-based knowledge extraction pipeline is used as a use case in this study. Discovering the relation between FAIR and accountability and transparency helps in identifying and mitigating risks associated with deploying OSysts. This also allows providing design guidelines that help accountability and transparency to be embedded in OSysts. We found that FAIR can be used as a transparency indicator. We also found that the studied vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation metrics do not cover FAIR, accountability and transparency. Accordingly, we suggest these concepts should be considered as vocabulary and ontology quality evaluation aspects. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the relation between FAIR and accountability and transparency concepts has been found and used for evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信