新出现的神经伦理问题背景下的个人责任与人的自由意志——来自近期判例法的一些评论

Elettra Stradella
{"title":"新出现的神经伦理问题背景下的个人责任与人的自由意志——来自近期判例法的一些评论","authors":"Elettra Stradella","doi":"10.4018/jte.2012040104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author analyses the issues connected to emerging neurotechnologies, in particular their effects on legal concepts like capacity, liability, testimony, and evidence, and also on fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms like the right to autonomy and the right not to be treated without consent in the general framework of the principle of human dignity. Starting from preliminary remarks on the key-concepts of neuroethics/technoethics, neurolaw/technolaw, the author investigates how personal liability is changing in the framework of new scientific developments. The paper underlines that neurolaw challenges some of the traditional legal institutions in the field of law e.g., criminal law. From the point of view of ethics, the paper concludes that neuroethics is not challenged by the data coming from the use of emerging neurotechnologies, but human self-perception is strongly affected by it.","PeriodicalId":287069,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Technoethics","volume":"98 Suppl 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Liability and Human Free Will in the Background of Emerging Neuroethical Issues: Some Remarks Arising From Recent Case Law\",\"authors\":\"Elettra Stradella\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/jte.2012040104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the author analyses the issues connected to emerging neurotechnologies, in particular their effects on legal concepts like capacity, liability, testimony, and evidence, and also on fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms like the right to autonomy and the right not to be treated without consent in the general framework of the principle of human dignity. Starting from preliminary remarks on the key-concepts of neuroethics/technoethics, neurolaw/technolaw, the author investigates how personal liability is changing in the framework of new scientific developments. The paper underlines that neurolaw challenges some of the traditional legal institutions in the field of law e.g., criminal law. From the point of view of ethics, the paper concludes that neuroethics is not challenged by the data coming from the use of emerging neurotechnologies, but human self-perception is strongly affected by it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Technoethics\",\"volume\":\"98 Suppl 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Technoethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2012040104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Technoethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2012040104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本文中,作者分析了与新兴神经技术相关的问题,特别是它们对能力、责任、证词和证据等法律概念的影响,以及对基本宪法权利和自由的影响,如自治权和在人类尊严原则的总体框架内不未经同意而被对待的权利。作者从对神经伦理学/技术伦理学、神经法/技术法等关键概念的初步评述出发,考察了个人责任在新科学发展的框架下是如何变化的。本文强调,神经法学挑战了法律领域的一些传统法律制度,例如刑法。从伦理学的角度来看,本文认为神经伦理学并未受到来自新兴神经技术使用的数据的挑战,但人类的自我感知却受到了它的强烈影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal Liability and Human Free Will in the Background of Emerging Neuroethical Issues: Some Remarks Arising From Recent Case Law
In this paper, the author analyses the issues connected to emerging neurotechnologies, in particular their effects on legal concepts like capacity, liability, testimony, and evidence, and also on fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms like the right to autonomy and the right not to be treated without consent in the general framework of the principle of human dignity. Starting from preliminary remarks on the key-concepts of neuroethics/technoethics, neurolaw/technolaw, the author investigates how personal liability is changing in the framework of new scientific developments. The paper underlines that neurolaw challenges some of the traditional legal institutions in the field of law e.g., criminal law. From the point of view of ethics, the paper concludes that neuroethics is not challenged by the data coming from the use of emerging neurotechnologies, but human self-perception is strongly affected by it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信