基于优势列表的渐进排名

DBRank '13 Pub Date : 2013-08-30 DOI:10.1145/2524828.2524834
Yann Loyer, Isma Sadoun, K. Zeitouni
{"title":"基于优势列表的渐进排名","authors":"Yann Loyer, Isma Sadoun, K. Zeitouni","doi":"10.1145/2524828.2524834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preference queries aim at increasing personalized pertinence of a selection. The most famous ones are the skyline queries based on the concept of dominance introduced by Pareto. Many other dominances have been proposed. In particular, many weaker forms of dominance aim at reducing the size of the answer of the skyline query. In most cases, applying just one dominance is not satisfying as it is hard to conciliate high pertinence, i.e. a strong dominance, and reasonable size of the selection. We propose to allow the user to decide what dominances are reliable, and what priorities between those dominances should be respected. This can be done by defining a sequence, eventually transfinite, of dominances. According to that sequence, we propose operators that compute progressively the ranking of a dataset by successive applications of the dominances without introducing inconsistencies. The principle of progressive refinement provides a great flexibility to the user that can not only dynamically decide to stop the process whenever the results satisfies his/her wishes, but can also navigates in the different levels of ranking and be aware of the level of reliability of each successive refinement.","PeriodicalId":206590,"journal":{"name":"DBRank '13","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progressive ranking based on a dominance list\",\"authors\":\"Yann Loyer, Isma Sadoun, K. Zeitouni\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2524828.2524834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preference queries aim at increasing personalized pertinence of a selection. The most famous ones are the skyline queries based on the concept of dominance introduced by Pareto. Many other dominances have been proposed. In particular, many weaker forms of dominance aim at reducing the size of the answer of the skyline query. In most cases, applying just one dominance is not satisfying as it is hard to conciliate high pertinence, i.e. a strong dominance, and reasonable size of the selection. We propose to allow the user to decide what dominances are reliable, and what priorities between those dominances should be respected. This can be done by defining a sequence, eventually transfinite, of dominances. According to that sequence, we propose operators that compute progressively the ranking of a dataset by successive applications of the dominances without introducing inconsistencies. The principle of progressive refinement provides a great flexibility to the user that can not only dynamically decide to stop the process whenever the results satisfies his/her wishes, but can also navigates in the different levels of ranking and be aware of the level of reliability of each successive refinement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DBRank '13\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DBRank '13\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2524828.2524834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DBRank '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2524828.2524834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

偏好查询的目的是增加选择的个性化针对性。其中最著名的是基于帕累托引入的支配概念的天际线查询。人们还提出了许多其他优势。特别是,许多较弱形式的优势旨在减少天际线查询的答案的大小。在大多数情况下,只使用一种优势并不令人满意,因为很难调和高相关性,即强大的优势和合理的选择规模。我们建议允许用户决定哪些优势是可靠的,以及这些优势之间的优先级应该得到尊重。这可以通过定义一个序列(最终是超限的)优势来实现。根据该序列,我们提出了通过连续应用优势来逐步计算数据集排名的算子,而不会引入不一致性。渐进细化的原则为用户提供了很大的灵活性,用户不仅可以动态地决定在结果满足他/她的愿望时停止该过程,而且还可以在不同级别的排名中导航,并了解每个连续细化的可靠性级别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progressive ranking based on a dominance list
Preference queries aim at increasing personalized pertinence of a selection. The most famous ones are the skyline queries based on the concept of dominance introduced by Pareto. Many other dominances have been proposed. In particular, many weaker forms of dominance aim at reducing the size of the answer of the skyline query. In most cases, applying just one dominance is not satisfying as it is hard to conciliate high pertinence, i.e. a strong dominance, and reasonable size of the selection. We propose to allow the user to decide what dominances are reliable, and what priorities between those dominances should be respected. This can be done by defining a sequence, eventually transfinite, of dominances. According to that sequence, we propose operators that compute progressively the ranking of a dataset by successive applications of the dominances without introducing inconsistencies. The principle of progressive refinement provides a great flexibility to the user that can not only dynamically decide to stop the process whenever the results satisfies his/her wishes, but can also navigates in the different levels of ranking and be aware of the level of reliability of each successive refinement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信