{"title":"极简程序与最优理论:哪个是最优的?作为案例研究的Wh-Elements","authors":"Inass Announi, T. A. Afkinich","doi":"10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.2.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes wh-questions from the perspective of the theories of the Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory. We look at specific wh-constructions, including the gap strategy, the in-situ strategy, multiple wh-questions, and relativized wh-questions. This paper shows both the similarities and differences between OT and MP in analyzing wh-elements. One crucial difference is that OT solves the problem of optionality and clearly tackles some aspects of the syntax-pragmatics interface.","PeriodicalId":204201,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory: Which is the Most Optimal? Wh-Elements as a Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Inass Announi, T. A. Afkinich\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.2.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes wh-questions from the perspective of the theories of the Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory. We look at specific wh-constructions, including the gap strategy, the in-situ strategy, multiple wh-questions, and relativized wh-questions. This paper shows both the similarities and differences between OT and MP in analyzing wh-elements. One crucial difference is that OT solves the problem of optionality and clearly tackles some aspects of the syntax-pragmatics interface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.2.72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.2.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory: Which is the Most Optimal? Wh-Elements as a Case Study
This study analyzes wh-questions from the perspective of the theories of the Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory. We look at specific wh-constructions, including the gap strategy, the in-situ strategy, multiple wh-questions, and relativized wh-questions. This paper shows both the similarities and differences between OT and MP in analyzing wh-elements. One crucial difference is that OT solves the problem of optionality and clearly tackles some aspects of the syntax-pragmatics interface.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
