国家教育计算政策选择

ACM '84 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1145/800171.809669

Ronald E. Anderson, R. Aiken, Richard T. Close, K. Duncan, Marc Tucker

{"title":"国家教育计算政策选择","authors":"Ronald E. Anderson, R. Aiken, Richard T. Close, K. Duncan, Marc Tucker","doi":"10.1145/800171.809669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the past two years a number of bills have been introduced in the U. S. Congress to improve the quantity and quality of computer instruction in our nation's schools and colleges. While none of these bills are likely to pass before the presidential election, they raise major policy questions regarding what is needed (and should be implemented) in 1985 and beyond.","PeriodicalId":218138,"journal":{"name":"ACM '84","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National educational computing policy alternatives\",\"authors\":\"Ronald E. Anderson, R. Aiken, Richard T. Close, K. Duncan, Marc Tucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800171.809669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the past two years a number of bills have been introduced in the U. S. Congress to improve the quantity and quality of computer instruction in our nation's schools and colleges. While none of these bills are likely to pass before the presidential election, they raise major policy questions regarding what is needed (and should be implemented) in 1985 and beyond.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM '84\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM '84\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800171.809669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '84","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800171.809669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的两年中，美国国会提出了许多法案，以提高我国中小学和大学计算机教学的数量和质量。虽然这些法案都不太可能在总统大选前通过，但它们提出了一些重大的政策问题，即1985年及以后需要(和应该实施)什么。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

National educational computing policy alternatives

During the past two years a number of bills have been introduced in the U. S. Congress to improve the quantity and quality of computer instruction in our nation's schools and colleges. While none of these bills are likely to pass before the presidential election, they raise major policy questions regarding what is needed (and should be implemented) in 1985 and beyond.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACM '84

自引率

0.00%

发文量