雷暴大风识别的机器学习方法比较研究

Haifeng Li, Yan Li, Xutao Li, Yunming Ye, Xian Li, Pengfei Xie
{"title":"雷暴大风识别的机器学习方法比较研究","authors":"Haifeng Li, Yan Li, Xutao Li, Yunming Ye, Xian Li, Pengfei Xie","doi":"10.1145/3318299.3318317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we make a comparative study to examine the performance of different machine learning approaches for the thunderstorm gale identification. To this end, a thunderstorm gale benchmark dataset is constructed, which comprises radar images in Guangdong from 2015 to 2017. The corresponding wind velocities recorded by the automatic meteorological observation stations are utilized to offer the ground-truth. Based on the dataset, we evaluate the performance of Decision Tree Regressor (DT), Linear Regression (LR), Ridge regression, Lasso regression, Random Forest Regressor (RFR), K-nearest Neighbor Regressor (KNNR), Bayesian Ridge Regressor (BR), Adaboost Regressor (AR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Ten important features are extracted to apply these approaches, except CNN, which include radar echo intensity, radar reflectivity factor, radar combined reflectivity, vertical integrated liquid, echo tops and their changes with respect to (w.r.t.) time. Experimental results demonstrate the machine learning approaches can effectively identify the thunderstorm gale, and the CNN model performs the best. Finally, a thunderstorm system is developed based on CNN model, which help meteorologists to identify thunderstorm gales in terms of radar images.","PeriodicalId":164987,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Approaches to Thunderstorm Gale Identification\",\"authors\":\"Haifeng Li, Yan Li, Xutao Li, Yunming Ye, Xian Li, Pengfei Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3318299.3318317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we make a comparative study to examine the performance of different machine learning approaches for the thunderstorm gale identification. To this end, a thunderstorm gale benchmark dataset is constructed, which comprises radar images in Guangdong from 2015 to 2017. The corresponding wind velocities recorded by the automatic meteorological observation stations are utilized to offer the ground-truth. Based on the dataset, we evaluate the performance of Decision Tree Regressor (DT), Linear Regression (LR), Ridge regression, Lasso regression, Random Forest Regressor (RFR), K-nearest Neighbor Regressor (KNNR), Bayesian Ridge Regressor (BR), Adaboost Regressor (AR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Ten important features are extracted to apply these approaches, except CNN, which include radar echo intensity, radar reflectivity factor, radar combined reflectivity, vertical integrated liquid, echo tops and their changes with respect to (w.r.t.) time. Experimental results demonstrate the machine learning approaches can effectively identify the thunderstorm gale, and the CNN model performs the best. Finally, a thunderstorm system is developed based on CNN model, which help meteorologists to identify thunderstorm gales in terms of radar images.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3318299.3318317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3318299.3318317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对不同机器学习方法在雷暴烈风识别中的性能进行了比较研究。为此,构建了广东省2015 - 2017年雷暴大风基准数据集。利用自动气象观测站记录的相应风速来提供地面真实值。基于该数据集,我们评估了决策树回归器(DT)、线性回归器(LR)、Ridge回归器、Lasso回归器、随机森林回归器(RFR)、k近邻回归器(KNNR)、贝叶斯Ridge回归器(BR)、Adaboost回归器(AR)、支持向量回归器(SVR)、梯度增强回归器(GBR)和卷积神经网络(CNN)的性能。除CNN外,还提取了雷达回波强度、雷达反射率因子、雷达组合反射率、垂直积分液体、回波顶及其随时间的变化等10个重要特征来应用这些方法。实验结果表明,机器学习方法可以有效地识别雷暴大风,其中CNN模型表现最好。最后,基于CNN模型开发了雷暴系统,帮助气象学家根据雷达图像识别雷暴大风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Approaches to Thunderstorm Gale Identification
In this paper, we make a comparative study to examine the performance of different machine learning approaches for the thunderstorm gale identification. To this end, a thunderstorm gale benchmark dataset is constructed, which comprises radar images in Guangdong from 2015 to 2017. The corresponding wind velocities recorded by the automatic meteorological observation stations are utilized to offer the ground-truth. Based on the dataset, we evaluate the performance of Decision Tree Regressor (DT), Linear Regression (LR), Ridge regression, Lasso regression, Random Forest Regressor (RFR), K-nearest Neighbor Regressor (KNNR), Bayesian Ridge Regressor (BR), Adaboost Regressor (AR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Ten important features are extracted to apply these approaches, except CNN, which include radar echo intensity, radar reflectivity factor, radar combined reflectivity, vertical integrated liquid, echo tops and their changes with respect to (w.r.t.) time. Experimental results demonstrate the machine learning approaches can effectively identify the thunderstorm gale, and the CNN model performs the best. Finally, a thunderstorm system is developed based on CNN model, which help meteorologists to identify thunderstorm gales in terms of radar images.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信