利用学习交易代理模拟可再生能源市场政策的绩效

Riccardo Fagiani, R. Hakvoort
{"title":"利用学习交易代理模拟可再生能源市场政策的绩效","authors":"Riccardo Fagiani, R. Hakvoort","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2014.6861207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different instruments are available to support electricity generation from renewable energy sources. However, it is still controversial and highly debated which policy leads to preferable results for society. The European Commission has recently stated that a policy relying on a competitive allocation mechanism forcing market players to reveal their real generation costs is preferable. The commission recommends to either allocating feed-in premiums through a tender mechanisms, or to implement a renewable quota obligation scheme. As any other market-based mechanism, both systems are vulnerable to manipulation by market participants. This paper analyzes and compares the performance of the above mentioned mechanisms by simulating the behavior of market participants as adaptive learning agents.","PeriodicalId":261127,"journal":{"name":"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulating the performance of market-based policies for renewable energy using learning trading agents\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Fagiani, R. Hakvoort\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2014.6861207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different instruments are available to support electricity generation from renewable energy sources. However, it is still controversial and highly debated which policy leads to preferable results for society. The European Commission has recently stated that a policy relying on a competitive allocation mechanism forcing market players to reveal their real generation costs is preferable. The commission recommends to either allocating feed-in premiums through a tender mechanisms, or to implement a renewable quota obligation scheme. As any other market-based mechanism, both systems are vulnerable to manipulation by market participants. This paper analyzes and compares the performance of the above mentioned mechanisms by simulating the behavior of market participants as adaptive learning agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2014.6861207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2014.6861207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

有不同的工具可用于支持可再生能源发电。然而,哪一项政策会给社会带来更好的结果仍然存在争议和高度争论。欧盟委员会最近表示,依靠竞争性分配机制迫使市场参与者披露其实际发电成本的政策是可取的。欧盟委员会建议,要么通过招标机制分配上网电价,要么实施可再生配额义务计划。与任何其他基于市场的机制一样,这两种制度都容易受到市场参与者的操纵。本文通过模拟市场参与者作为自适应学习主体的行为,对上述机制的性能进行了分析和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulating the performance of market-based policies for renewable energy using learning trading agents
Different instruments are available to support electricity generation from renewable energy sources. However, it is still controversial and highly debated which policy leads to preferable results for society. The European Commission has recently stated that a policy relying on a competitive allocation mechanism forcing market players to reveal their real generation costs is preferable. The commission recommends to either allocating feed-in premiums through a tender mechanisms, or to implement a renewable quota obligation scheme. As any other market-based mechanism, both systems are vulnerable to manipulation by market participants. This paper analyzes and compares the performance of the above mentioned mechanisms by simulating the behavior of market participants as adaptive learning agents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信