{"title":"基层人民法院参与基层社会治理的思考","authors":"","doi":"10.22158/jrph.v6n1p54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grassroots social governance, as the foundation and cornerstone of national governance, is concerned with the most direct, realistic, and urgent problems that the people want to resolve. However, there are some problems in the grassroots People’s Court’s participation in grassroots social governance, such as insufficient team capacity, imperfect working mechanisms, inadequate judicial confirmation, and poor role of the court. To solve those issues, solutions are proposed in the paper.","PeriodicalId":229607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughts on the Participation of Grassroots People’s Courts in Grassroots Social Governance\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/jrph.v6n1p54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grassroots social governance, as the foundation and cornerstone of national governance, is concerned with the most direct, realistic, and urgent problems that the people want to resolve. However, there are some problems in the grassroots People’s Court’s participation in grassroots social governance, such as insufficient team capacity, imperfect working mechanisms, inadequate judicial confirmation, and poor role of the court. To solve those issues, solutions are proposed in the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v6n1p54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v6n1p54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thoughts on the Participation of Grassroots People’s Courts in Grassroots Social Governance
Grassroots social governance, as the foundation and cornerstone of national governance, is concerned with the most direct, realistic, and urgent problems that the people want to resolve. However, there are some problems in the grassroots People’s Court’s participation in grassroots social governance, such as insufficient team capacity, imperfect working mechanisms, inadequate judicial confirmation, and poor role of the court. To solve those issues, solutions are proposed in the paper.