{"title":"利用精确度-召回率曲线下面积评价软件缺陷预测模型的性能","authors":"Shahzad Ali Khan, Z. Rana","doi":"10.23919/ICACS.2019.8689135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software defect prediction (SDP) models are used to improve effort and testing estimate of software by identifying defective modules beforehand. Precision, recall/true positive rate and false positive rate have been used to evaluate the performance of models. In literature, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) has been used to evaluate the model performance. The standard learning goal of the defect model is to optimize the (AUC-ROC). Use of this measure has also been advocated in numerous benchmarking studies. The literature has discussed the performance bar (or so-called ceiling effect) of AUC-ROC targeted models. The literature has also indicated the use of area under precision recall curve (AUC-PR) as an evaluation parameter for the models. This study investigates if AUC-PR curve gives different information regarding model performance. To this end this study ranks the existing models based on AUC-ROC and AUC-PR and report the change in ranking of these models. The change in ranking gives an opportunity to study if the ceiling effect can be managed and AUC-PR (instead of AUC-ROC) can be considered as a goal for the prediction models. AUC-PR based evaluation of the models can help avoid the extra cost, time, and effort employed to test non-defective modules.","PeriodicalId":290819,"journal":{"name":"2019 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Performance of Software Defect Prediction Models Using Area Under Precision-Recall Curve (AUC-PR)\",\"authors\":\"Shahzad Ali Khan, Z. Rana\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ICACS.2019.8689135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software defect prediction (SDP) models are used to improve effort and testing estimate of software by identifying defective modules beforehand. Precision, recall/true positive rate and false positive rate have been used to evaluate the performance of models. In literature, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) has been used to evaluate the model performance. The standard learning goal of the defect model is to optimize the (AUC-ROC). Use of this measure has also been advocated in numerous benchmarking studies. The literature has discussed the performance bar (or so-called ceiling effect) of AUC-ROC targeted models. The literature has also indicated the use of area under precision recall curve (AUC-PR) as an evaluation parameter for the models. This study investigates if AUC-PR curve gives different information regarding model performance. To this end this study ranks the existing models based on AUC-ROC and AUC-PR and report the change in ranking of these models. The change in ranking gives an opportunity to study if the ceiling effect can be managed and AUC-PR (instead of AUC-ROC) can be considered as a goal for the prediction models. AUC-PR based evaluation of the models can help avoid the extra cost, time, and effort employed to test non-defective modules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":290819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACS.2019.8689135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACS.2019.8689135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Performance of Software Defect Prediction Models Using Area Under Precision-Recall Curve (AUC-PR)
Software defect prediction (SDP) models are used to improve effort and testing estimate of software by identifying defective modules beforehand. Precision, recall/true positive rate and false positive rate have been used to evaluate the performance of models. In literature, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) has been used to evaluate the model performance. The standard learning goal of the defect model is to optimize the (AUC-ROC). Use of this measure has also been advocated in numerous benchmarking studies. The literature has discussed the performance bar (or so-called ceiling effect) of AUC-ROC targeted models. The literature has also indicated the use of area under precision recall curve (AUC-PR) as an evaluation parameter for the models. This study investigates if AUC-PR curve gives different information regarding model performance. To this end this study ranks the existing models based on AUC-ROC and AUC-PR and report the change in ranking of these models. The change in ranking gives an opportunity to study if the ceiling effect can be managed and AUC-PR (instead of AUC-ROC) can be considered as a goal for the prediction models. AUC-PR based evaluation of the models can help avoid the extra cost, time, and effort employed to test non-defective modules.