湿地处理灰水技术选择的模糊topsis决策模型

Ameso Chikogu, Korkor Michelle, Donkor Amponsah, A. Dauda, Jessey Stephen
{"title":"湿地处理灰水技术选择的模糊topsis决策模型","authors":"Ameso Chikogu, Korkor Michelle, Donkor Amponsah, A. Dauda, Jessey Stephen","doi":"10.5937/poljteh2302014a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of constructed wetlands for improving greywater treatment by improving nutrient removal at a lower cost than conventional methods has recently attracted renewed interest. The majority of these studies have predominantly pre-defined a wetland configuration for wastewater treatment, which introduces a lot of empiricism in decision-making. To address this problem, this study aims to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) for the selection, design, and optimization of constructed wetlands technologies (CWT) during greywater treatment. To evaluate WT for greywater treatment and determine which physic-chemical and microbial properties need to be treated. A multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) tool is used simultaneously with a conformity assessment. The DSS was developed after a thorough review of the literature on the design and implementation of various WT (HFWSF, HSSF, VSSF, and VFSF) and greywater characteristics using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. This study is interesting in that, it integrates contextual data (wastewater characteristics) with WT removal efficiency characteristics to assist you in selecting the best WT. Typha domingensi and Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) were effective at removing contaminants when combined with HFWSF WT. After four-month of study, The HFWSF CWT treatment with hyacinth was found to be effective. for the HFWSF-CWT treatment with hyacinth, the removal efficiency of Faecal coliform, Total coliform, Oil and Grease, Ammonia, Total Phosphate, and COD. 78.46%, 74.33%, 73.08%, 69.23%, 25.29%, and 80% respectively. DSS decision on HFWSF-CWT DSS has demonstrated that it is a competently designed noval dashboard for choosing CWT for the treatment of greywater.","PeriodicalId":281326,"journal":{"name":"Poljoprivredna tehnika","volume":"315 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fuzzy-topsis decision-making model for selections of wetland technology for greywater treatment\",\"authors\":\"Ameso Chikogu, Korkor Michelle, Donkor Amponsah, A. Dauda, Jessey Stephen\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/poljteh2302014a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of constructed wetlands for improving greywater treatment by improving nutrient removal at a lower cost than conventional methods has recently attracted renewed interest. The majority of these studies have predominantly pre-defined a wetland configuration for wastewater treatment, which introduces a lot of empiricism in decision-making. To address this problem, this study aims to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) for the selection, design, and optimization of constructed wetlands technologies (CWT) during greywater treatment. To evaluate WT for greywater treatment and determine which physic-chemical and microbial properties need to be treated. A multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) tool is used simultaneously with a conformity assessment. The DSS was developed after a thorough review of the literature on the design and implementation of various WT (HFWSF, HSSF, VSSF, and VFSF) and greywater characteristics using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. This study is interesting in that, it integrates contextual data (wastewater characteristics) with WT removal efficiency characteristics to assist you in selecting the best WT. Typha domingensi and Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) were effective at removing contaminants when combined with HFWSF WT. After four-month of study, The HFWSF CWT treatment with hyacinth was found to be effective. for the HFWSF-CWT treatment with hyacinth, the removal efficiency of Faecal coliform, Total coliform, Oil and Grease, Ammonia, Total Phosphate, and COD. 78.46%, 74.33%, 73.08%, 69.23%, 25.29%, and 80% respectively. DSS decision on HFWSF-CWT DSS has demonstrated that it is a competently designed noval dashboard for choosing CWT for the treatment of greywater.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poljoprivredna tehnika\",\"volume\":\"315 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poljoprivredna tehnika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/poljteh2302014a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poljoprivredna tehnika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/poljteh2302014a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用人工湿地以比传统方法更低的成本去除营养物质,从而改善灰水处理,最近引起了人们新的兴趣。这些研究大多预先定义了用于废水处理的湿地配置,这在决策中引入了许多经验主义。为了解决这一问题,本研究旨在开发一个决策支持系统(DSS),用于灰水处理过程中人工湿地技术的选择、设计和优化。评估WT处理灰水的效果,确定需要处理哪些物理化学和微生物特性。多准则决策(MCDM)工具与合格评定同时使用。DSS是在使用Microsoft Visual Studio 2010对各种WT (HFWSF、HSSF、VSSF和VFSF)和灰水特性的设计和实现文献进行全面审查后开发的。这项研究的有趣之处在于,它将环境数据(废水特征)与小水疱去除效率特征相结合,以帮助您选择最佳小水疱。当与HFWSF小水疱联合使用时,Typha domingensi和hyacinths (Eichhornia crassipes)可以有效去除污染物。经过四个月的研究,发现HFWSF小水疱与风信子的处理是有效的。水葫芦对HFWSF-CWT处理粪大肠菌群、总大肠菌群、油脂、氨、总磷酸盐和COD的去除率进行了研究。分别为78.46%、74.33%、73.08%、69.23%、25.29%和80%。结果表明,DSS是一种设计合理的选择CWT处理灰水的新型仪表盘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A fuzzy-topsis decision-making model for selections of wetland technology for greywater treatment
The use of constructed wetlands for improving greywater treatment by improving nutrient removal at a lower cost than conventional methods has recently attracted renewed interest. The majority of these studies have predominantly pre-defined a wetland configuration for wastewater treatment, which introduces a lot of empiricism in decision-making. To address this problem, this study aims to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) for the selection, design, and optimization of constructed wetlands technologies (CWT) during greywater treatment. To evaluate WT for greywater treatment and determine which physic-chemical and microbial properties need to be treated. A multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) tool is used simultaneously with a conformity assessment. The DSS was developed after a thorough review of the literature on the design and implementation of various WT (HFWSF, HSSF, VSSF, and VFSF) and greywater characteristics using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. This study is interesting in that, it integrates contextual data (wastewater characteristics) with WT removal efficiency characteristics to assist you in selecting the best WT. Typha domingensi and Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) were effective at removing contaminants when combined with HFWSF WT. After four-month of study, The HFWSF CWT treatment with hyacinth was found to be effective. for the HFWSF-CWT treatment with hyacinth, the removal efficiency of Faecal coliform, Total coliform, Oil and Grease, Ammonia, Total Phosphate, and COD. 78.46%, 74.33%, 73.08%, 69.23%, 25.29%, and 80% respectively. DSS decision on HFWSF-CWT DSS has demonstrated that it is a competently designed noval dashboard for choosing CWT for the treatment of greywater.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信