人和虚拟医生的访问:了解远程医疗场景的多个接受方面

Sarah Mennicken, O. Sack, M. Ziefle
{"title":"人和虚拟医生的访问:了解远程医疗场景的多个接受方面","authors":"Sarah Mennicken, O. Sack, M. Ziefle","doi":"10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we report on a study exploring multiple aspects of a virtual doctor's visit as a commonly used example for telemedical services. We compare the conventional doctor's visit with the virtual visit to identify user requirements and needs for the acceptance of such a scenario. In our survey we retrieved data from a total of 93 users between 16 and 67 years. The results of this study describe differences (and similarities) of criteria for choosing a doctor, basic requirements to accept a virtual doctor's visit, and people's opinions on common pro and contra arguments on this scenario. We analyzed the data for potential influences from various user characteristics, such as age, gender, social behavior, or technical competence. Interestingly, most of the reported concerns are not influenced by gender or age, while participants' technical self-confidence is related with various acceptance aspects.","PeriodicalId":444978,"journal":{"name":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"People and a virtual doctor's visit: Learning about multiple acceptance aspects of a telemedical scenario\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Mennicken, O. Sack, M. Ziefle\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we report on a study exploring multiple aspects of a virtual doctor's visit as a commonly used example for telemedical services. We compare the conventional doctor's visit with the virtual visit to identify user requirements and needs for the acceptance of such a scenario. In our survey we retrieved data from a total of 93 users between 16 and 67 years. The results of this study describe differences (and similarities) of criteria for choosing a doctor, basic requirements to accept a virtual doctor's visit, and people's opinions on common pro and contra arguments on this scenario. We analyzed the data for potential influences from various user characteristics, such as age, gender, social behavior, or technical competence. Interestingly, most of the reported concerns are not influenced by gender or age, while participants' technical self-confidence is related with various acceptance aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在本文中,我们报告了一项研究,探索了虚拟医生访问的多个方面,作为远程医疗服务的常用示例。我们将传统的医生访问与虚拟访问进行比较,以确定用户接受这种场景的要求和需求。在我们的调查,我们从93用户检索数据16至67年。本研究的结果描述了选择医生的标准的差异(和相似之处),接受虚拟医生就诊的基本要求,以及人们对这种情况下常见的赞成和反对论点的看法。我们分析了潜在的影响来自不同用户的数据特征,如年龄、性别、社会行为、或技术能力。有趣的是,大多数报告的担忧不受性别或年龄的影响,而参与者的技术自信与各种接受方面有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
People and a virtual doctor's visit: Learning about multiple acceptance aspects of a telemedical scenario
In this paper we report on a study exploring multiple aspects of a virtual doctor's visit as a commonly used example for telemedical services. We compare the conventional doctor's visit with the virtual visit to identify user requirements and needs for the acceptance of such a scenario. In our survey we retrieved data from a total of 93 users between 16 and 67 years. The results of this study describe differences (and similarities) of criteria for choosing a doctor, basic requirements to accept a virtual doctor's visit, and people's opinions on common pro and contra arguments on this scenario. We analyzed the data for potential influences from various user characteristics, such as age, gender, social behavior, or technical competence. Interestingly, most of the reported concerns are not influenced by gender or age, while participants' technical self-confidence is related with various acceptance aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信