机器人框架与黄瓜作为BDD自动化测试工具的比较研究

Khaerunnisa Khaerunnisa, N. Selviandro, Rosa Reska Riskiana
{"title":"机器人框架与黄瓜作为BDD自动化测试工具的比较研究","authors":"Khaerunnisa Khaerunnisa, N. Selviandro, Rosa Reska Riskiana","doi":"10.31937/ti.v15i1.3228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automation testing is much more efficient and accurate, the script is easy to document, and update compared to manual testing. Testing a website may necessitate time and effort to learn the tools to be used. Cucumber and Robot Framework are well-known open-source frameworks, according to Stack Overflow and GitHub. Cucumber and Robot Framework are known on an international scale, especially Robot Framework, which is often used by large companies. Each uses the Java and Python languages, which both support BDD. The comparative efforts of the two tools aim to help testers compare and determine automated testing tools in the BisOps Logee Port Web Admin case study based on the effectiveness and efficiency of the tools and create specific test cases as test documentation so that testers do not need to spend time analyzing both. Because this research involves evaluation and comparison, several criteria were chosen to support the evaluation process, namely functionality, reliability, usability, performance efficiency, and portability. The results of this study show that both tools can be recommended for novice QA's who want to learn the basics of automation by implementing BDD. Meanwhile, for QA's who have done automation before and want to do more in-depth configuration and reporting, it is recommended to use Robot Framework because the syntax is short, has lots of keywords that make it easier for testers, and can make the testing system shorter but more specific.","PeriodicalId":347196,"journal":{"name":"Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Robot Framework and Cucumber as BDD Automated Testing Tools\",\"authors\":\"Khaerunnisa Khaerunnisa, N. Selviandro, Rosa Reska Riskiana\",\"doi\":\"10.31937/ti.v15i1.3228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automation testing is much more efficient and accurate, the script is easy to document, and update compared to manual testing. Testing a website may necessitate time and effort to learn the tools to be used. Cucumber and Robot Framework are well-known open-source frameworks, according to Stack Overflow and GitHub. Cucumber and Robot Framework are known on an international scale, especially Robot Framework, which is often used by large companies. Each uses the Java and Python languages, which both support BDD. The comparative efforts of the two tools aim to help testers compare and determine automated testing tools in the BisOps Logee Port Web Admin case study based on the effectiveness and efficiency of the tools and create specific test cases as test documentation so that testers do not need to spend time analyzing both. Because this research involves evaluation and comparison, several criteria were chosen to support the evaluation process, namely functionality, reliability, usability, performance efficiency, and portability. The results of this study show that both tools can be recommended for novice QA's who want to learn the basics of automation by implementing BDD. Meanwhile, for QA's who have done automation before and want to do more in-depth configuration and reporting, it is recommended to use Robot Framework because the syntax is short, has lots of keywords that make it easier for testers, and can make the testing system shorter but more specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31937/ti.v15i1.3228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31937/ti.v15i1.3228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动化测试更加有效和准确,与手工测试相比,脚本更容易记录和更新。测试网站可能需要时间和精力来学习要使用的工具。根据Stack Overflow和GitHub, Cucumber和Robot Framework是众所周知的开源框架。Cucumber和Robot Framework在国际上都很有名,尤其是Robot Framework,经常被大公司使用。它们都使用Java和Python语言,这两种语言都支持BDD。这两种工具的比较工作旨在帮助测试人员根据工具的有效性和效率来比较和确定BisOps Logee Port Web Admin案例研究中的自动化测试工具,并创建特定的测试用例作为测试文档,以便测试人员不需要花费时间分析这两种工具。由于本研究涉及评估和比较,因此选择了几个标准来支持评估过程,即功能、可靠性、可用性、性能效率和可移植性。这项研究的结果表明,这两种工具都可以推荐给想要通过实现BDD来学习自动化基础知识的QA新手。同时,对于以前做过自动化的QA,想要做更深入的配置和报告,建议使用Robot Framework,因为它的语法很短,有很多关键字,使测试人员更容易使用,并且可以使测试系统更短但更具体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Robot Framework and Cucumber as BDD Automated Testing Tools
Automation testing is much more efficient and accurate, the script is easy to document, and update compared to manual testing. Testing a website may necessitate time and effort to learn the tools to be used. Cucumber and Robot Framework are well-known open-source frameworks, according to Stack Overflow and GitHub. Cucumber and Robot Framework are known on an international scale, especially Robot Framework, which is often used by large companies. Each uses the Java and Python languages, which both support BDD. The comparative efforts of the two tools aim to help testers compare and determine automated testing tools in the BisOps Logee Port Web Admin case study based on the effectiveness and efficiency of the tools and create specific test cases as test documentation so that testers do not need to spend time analyzing both. Because this research involves evaluation and comparison, several criteria were chosen to support the evaluation process, namely functionality, reliability, usability, performance efficiency, and portability. The results of this study show that both tools can be recommended for novice QA's who want to learn the basics of automation by implementing BDD. Meanwhile, for QA's who have done automation before and want to do more in-depth configuration and reporting, it is recommended to use Robot Framework because the syntax is short, has lots of keywords that make it easier for testers, and can make the testing system shorter but more specific.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信