多方利益相关者倡议的权力游戏

Sam Wong
{"title":"多方利益相关者倡议的权力游戏","authors":"Sam Wong","doi":"10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.SE.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The critiques of power inequalities in MSIs predominantly focus on the domination of trans-national corporations in the process of negotiation, owing to information asymmetry and resource and capacity differentials. To challenge their influences, some MSI protagonists, under the influence of institutional thinking, proposes ‘anti-firm’ strategies, such as stronger sanction, more effective monitoring, and developing strategic alliance among non-market stakeholders, in an attempt to redraw the balance of power. By evaluating the effectiveness of the ‘anti-firm’ proposals, this paper argues that targeting trans-national corporations as the villain would simply create a dichotomy of ‘them versus us’. This perspective shows an inadequate understanding of the complex incentive structures of different stakeholders. Preoccupied with the power dynamics within MSIs, other wider dimensions of power inequalities, such as North-South tension, global-local dilemmas, and the legitimacy of non-governmental organisations in MSIs, are all side-stepped.","PeriodicalId":429926,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Power Game of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives\",\"authors\":\"Sam Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.SE.00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The critiques of power inequalities in MSIs predominantly focus on the domination of trans-national corporations in the process of negotiation, owing to information asymmetry and resource and capacity differentials. To challenge their influences, some MSI protagonists, under the influence of institutional thinking, proposes ‘anti-firm’ strategies, such as stronger sanction, more effective monitoring, and developing strategic alliance among non-market stakeholders, in an attempt to redraw the balance of power. By evaluating the effectiveness of the ‘anti-firm’ proposals, this paper argues that targeting trans-national corporations as the villain would simply create a dichotomy of ‘them versus us’. This perspective shows an inadequate understanding of the complex incentive structures of different stakeholders. Preoccupied with the power dynamics within MSIs, other wider dimensions of power inequalities, such as North-South tension, global-local dilemmas, and the legitimacy of non-governmental organisations in MSIs, are all side-stepped.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.SE.00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.SE.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

MSIs中对权力不平等的批评主要集中在跨国公司在谈判过程中的主导地位,这是由于信息不对称和资源和能力差异造成的。为了挑战他们的影响,一些MSI的倡导者在制度思维的影响下,提出了“反企业”战略,如更强的制裁、更有效的监督、发展非市场利益相关者之间的战略联盟,试图重新划定权力平衡。通过评估“反公司”提案的有效性,本文认为,将跨国公司作为反派只会造成“他们与我们”的二分法。这种观点表明对不同利益相关者的复杂激励结构理解不足。专注于msi内部的权力动态,其他更广泛的权力不平等维度,如南北紧张,全球-地方困境,以及msi中非政府组织的合法性,都被回避了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Power Game of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
The critiques of power inequalities in MSIs predominantly focus on the domination of trans-national corporations in the process of negotiation, owing to information asymmetry and resource and capacity differentials. To challenge their influences, some MSI protagonists, under the influence of institutional thinking, proposes ‘anti-firm’ strategies, such as stronger sanction, more effective monitoring, and developing strategic alliance among non-market stakeholders, in an attempt to redraw the balance of power. By evaluating the effectiveness of the ‘anti-firm’ proposals, this paper argues that targeting trans-national corporations as the villain would simply create a dichotomy of ‘them versus us’. This perspective shows an inadequate understanding of the complex incentive structures of different stakeholders. Preoccupied with the power dynamics within MSIs, other wider dimensions of power inequalities, such as North-South tension, global-local dilemmas, and the legitimacy of non-governmental organisations in MSIs, are all side-stepped.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信