商业和投资中的信托义务:气候变化的影响

Janis Sarra
{"title":"商业和投资中的信托义务:气候变化的影响","authors":"Janis Sarra","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3356024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fiduciary obligation, under both corporate law and the common law, requires directors and officers to identify and address climate-related financial and other risks. In fulfilling their obligations to act in the best interests of the company, directors and officers must directly engage with developments in knowledge regarding physical and transition risks related to climate change and how these risks may impact their corporation. Depending on the firm’s economic activities, the risk may be minor or highly significant, but directors and officers have an obligation to make the inquiries, to devise strategies to address risks, and to have an ongoing monitoring to ensure the strategies continue to be responsive to the risk. Directors’ fiduciary duty requires that they have overseen and monitored the actions of the individuals charged with mitigation and adaptation; and have mechanisms in place to respond rapidly to changes in the company’s risk profile. In addition to fiduciary obligations, this study examines the statutory duty of care under corporate law, which requires directors and officers to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the circumstances. This duty requires directors and officers to supervise and manage the transition that will address the specific risks, as well as the new opportunities, posed by climate change. \n \nThe study also examines pension plan trustees and other investment fiduciaries in respect of their fiduciary obligations related to climate change. Pension fund trustees have a fiduciary obligation to pension beneficiaries to act prudently in their best interests in making investment decisions regarding fund portfolios. In fulfilling their obligations to beneficiaries, pension trustees and their investment managers have an obligation to identify and address climate-related financial risk. Trustees can take climate change into account as a legitimate investment issue over the short or long term or both. If trustees fail to act to address material climate change risk, they may be personally liable for breach of their fiduciary obligation. Inaction is no longer acceptable, given all the evidence that climate change risk is material across the entire economy. Trustees can also take climate change into account because they have duties as public fiduciaries additional to their financial duty to beneficiaries. Fiduciaries have a duty to act even where the potential costs and benefits of climate change cannot be fully quantified immediately. Fiduciary obligation also requires considering the benefits of investment in green adaption and mitigation technologies and other products and services that are likely to have upside financial potential for return on investment.","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiduciary Obligations in Business and Investment: Implications of Climate Change\",\"authors\":\"Janis Sarra\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3356024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fiduciary obligation, under both corporate law and the common law, requires directors and officers to identify and address climate-related financial and other risks. In fulfilling their obligations to act in the best interests of the company, directors and officers must directly engage with developments in knowledge regarding physical and transition risks related to climate change and how these risks may impact their corporation. Depending on the firm’s economic activities, the risk may be minor or highly significant, but directors and officers have an obligation to make the inquiries, to devise strategies to address risks, and to have an ongoing monitoring to ensure the strategies continue to be responsive to the risk. Directors’ fiduciary duty requires that they have overseen and monitored the actions of the individuals charged with mitigation and adaptation; and have mechanisms in place to respond rapidly to changes in the company’s risk profile. In addition to fiduciary obligations, this study examines the statutory duty of care under corporate law, which requires directors and officers to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the circumstances. This duty requires directors and officers to supervise and manage the transition that will address the specific risks, as well as the new opportunities, posed by climate change. \\n \\nThe study also examines pension plan trustees and other investment fiduciaries in respect of their fiduciary obligations related to climate change. Pension fund trustees have a fiduciary obligation to pension beneficiaries to act prudently in their best interests in making investment decisions regarding fund portfolios. In fulfilling their obligations to beneficiaries, pension trustees and their investment managers have an obligation to identify and address climate-related financial risk. Trustees can take climate change into account as a legitimate investment issue over the short or long term or both. If trustees fail to act to address material climate change risk, they may be personally liable for breach of their fiduciary obligation. Inaction is no longer acceptable, given all the evidence that climate change risk is material across the entire economy. Trustees can also take climate change into account because they have duties as public fiduciaries additional to their financial duty to beneficiaries. Fiduciaries have a duty to act even where the potential costs and benefits of climate change cannot be fully quantified immediately. Fiduciary obligation also requires considering the benefits of investment in green adaption and mitigation technologies and other products and services that are likely to have upside financial potential for return on investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3356024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3356024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据公司法和普通法,信托义务要求董事和高级管理人员识别和应对与气候相关的财务风险和其他风险。在履行其为公司最大利益行事的义务时,董事和高级管理人员必须直接参与有关气候变化相关的物理和过渡风险以及这些风险如何影响其公司的知识发展。根据公司的经济活动,风险可能是轻微的,也可能是非常严重的,但董事和高级管理人员有义务进行调查,制定应对风险的策略,并进行持续监控,以确保策略继续对风险作出反应。董事的信义义务要求他们监督和监测负责减缓和适应的个人的行动;并建立适当的机制,对公司风险状况的变化做出快速反应。除了信义义务外,本研究亦探讨公司法下的法定注意义务,即要求董事和高级职员在这种情况下行使一个合理审慎的人所应行使的注意、勤勉和技能。这一职责要求董事和高级管理人员监督和管理过渡期,以应对气候变化带来的具体风险和新机遇。该研究还审查了养老金计划受托人和其他投资受托人与气候变化有关的信托义务。退休基金受托人对退休基金受益人负有受托义务,在作出有关基金投资组合的投资决策时,应谨慎行事,以确保其最大利益。在履行对受益人的义务时,养老金受托人及其投资管理人有义务识别和应对与气候相关的金融风险。受托人可以将气候变化作为短期或长期或两者兼而有之的合法投资问题加以考虑。如果受托人未能采取行动应对重大气候变化风险,他们可能要为违反其受托义务承担个人责任。鉴于所有证据表明,气候变化风险在整个经济中都是重大的,无所作为再也不能被接受了。受托人还可以将气候变化考虑在内,因为除了对受益人负有财务责任外,他们还负有公共受托人的责任。受托人有责任采取行动,即使在气候变化的潜在成本和收益无法立即完全量化的情况下。受托义务还要求考虑投资于绿色适应和缓解技术以及其他可能在投资回报方面具有较高财务潜力的产品和服务所带来的惠益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fiduciary Obligations in Business and Investment: Implications of Climate Change
Fiduciary obligation, under both corporate law and the common law, requires directors and officers to identify and address climate-related financial and other risks. In fulfilling their obligations to act in the best interests of the company, directors and officers must directly engage with developments in knowledge regarding physical and transition risks related to climate change and how these risks may impact their corporation. Depending on the firm’s economic activities, the risk may be minor or highly significant, but directors and officers have an obligation to make the inquiries, to devise strategies to address risks, and to have an ongoing monitoring to ensure the strategies continue to be responsive to the risk. Directors’ fiduciary duty requires that they have overseen and monitored the actions of the individuals charged with mitigation and adaptation; and have mechanisms in place to respond rapidly to changes in the company’s risk profile. In addition to fiduciary obligations, this study examines the statutory duty of care under corporate law, which requires directors and officers to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the circumstances. This duty requires directors and officers to supervise and manage the transition that will address the specific risks, as well as the new opportunities, posed by climate change. The study also examines pension plan trustees and other investment fiduciaries in respect of their fiduciary obligations related to climate change. Pension fund trustees have a fiduciary obligation to pension beneficiaries to act prudently in their best interests in making investment decisions regarding fund portfolios. In fulfilling their obligations to beneficiaries, pension trustees and their investment managers have an obligation to identify and address climate-related financial risk. Trustees can take climate change into account as a legitimate investment issue over the short or long term or both. If trustees fail to act to address material climate change risk, they may be personally liable for breach of their fiduciary obligation. Inaction is no longer acceptable, given all the evidence that climate change risk is material across the entire economy. Trustees can also take climate change into account because they have duties as public fiduciaries additional to their financial duty to beneficiaries. Fiduciaries have a duty to act even where the potential costs and benefits of climate change cannot be fully quantified immediately. Fiduciary obligation also requires considering the benefits of investment in green adaption and mitigation technologies and other products and services that are likely to have upside financial potential for return on investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信