航天飞机软件故障数据集的回归分析

R. Karcich, G. Knafl, J. A. Morgan
{"title":"航天飞机软件故障数据集的回归分析","authors":"R. Karcich, G. Knafl, J. A. Morgan","doi":"10.1109/AERO.1996.499670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regression methods are employed in analyzing a Space Shuttle failure data set. A class of models based on transforms of cumulative time and cumulative failures is considered. It is used to predict both current as well as future log transformed failure intensity. This class includes several popular software reliability models including the exponential, logarithmic, and power models. It also includes models based on transforms of the time per failure, the time-varying analogue to the mean time between failures. Models are compared on the basis of their predictive performance as measured by the predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) criterion. Time per failure is included as one of the independent variables in the models identified as having the lowest PRESS score, both when predicting current as well as future log failure intensity. Analyses are conducted using failures within a final subset of the observation interval. This subset is chosen through inspection of the plot of time per failure in terms of cumulative time. The impact of the choice of this subset is assessed by comparing results for analyses of that subset with analyses of the data in the complete observation interval.","PeriodicalId":262646,"journal":{"name":"1996 IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference. Proceedings","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A regression analysis of a Space Shuttle software failure data set\",\"authors\":\"R. Karcich, G. Knafl, J. A. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AERO.1996.499670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regression methods are employed in analyzing a Space Shuttle failure data set. A class of models based on transforms of cumulative time and cumulative failures is considered. It is used to predict both current as well as future log transformed failure intensity. This class includes several popular software reliability models including the exponential, logarithmic, and power models. It also includes models based on transforms of the time per failure, the time-varying analogue to the mean time between failures. Models are compared on the basis of their predictive performance as measured by the predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) criterion. Time per failure is included as one of the independent variables in the models identified as having the lowest PRESS score, both when predicting current as well as future log failure intensity. Analyses are conducted using failures within a final subset of the observation interval. This subset is chosen through inspection of the plot of time per failure in terms of cumulative time. The impact of the choice of this subset is assessed by comparing results for analyses of that subset with analyses of the data in the complete observation interval.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1996 IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference. Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1996 IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference. Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.1996.499670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1996 IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.1996.499670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用回归分析方法对航天飞机故障数据集进行分析。考虑了一类基于累积时间和累积失效变换的模型。该方法可用于预测当前和未来测井转换后的失效强度。本课程包括几个流行的软件可靠性模型,包括指数模型、对数模型和幂模型。它还包括基于每次故障时间变换的模型,即对平均故障间隔时间的时变模拟。根据预测残差平方和(PRESS)准则对模型的预测性能进行比较。在预测当前和未来日志故障强度时,每次故障的时间被作为具有最低PRESS分数的模型中的一个独立变量。在观测区间的最终子集内使用故障进行分析。这个子集是通过检查按累积时间计算的每次故障时间图来选择的。通过比较该子集的分析结果与完整观察区间内的数据分析结果,可以评估该子集选择的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A regression analysis of a Space Shuttle software failure data set
Regression methods are employed in analyzing a Space Shuttle failure data set. A class of models based on transforms of cumulative time and cumulative failures is considered. It is used to predict both current as well as future log transformed failure intensity. This class includes several popular software reliability models including the exponential, logarithmic, and power models. It also includes models based on transforms of the time per failure, the time-varying analogue to the mean time between failures. Models are compared on the basis of their predictive performance as measured by the predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) criterion. Time per failure is included as one of the independent variables in the models identified as having the lowest PRESS score, both when predicting current as well as future log failure intensity. Analyses are conducted using failures within a final subset of the observation interval. This subset is chosen through inspection of the plot of time per failure in terms of cumulative time. The impact of the choice of this subset is assessed by comparing results for analyses of that subset with analyses of the data in the complete observation interval.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信