克服采用政策创新的障碍

Caraleigh Holverson
{"title":"克服采用政策创新的障碍","authors":"Caraleigh Holverson","doi":"10.1162/inov_a_00257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"likely not the first institution that comes to mind when considering agile, adaptive, and innovative new initiatives, but numerous federal departments and agencies have in fact been quietly moving toward such frameworks in recent years. This raises two questions: What does innovation look like in the current federal context? How can innovation thrive in a diverse, segmented, institutionally constrained, and risk-averse bureaucracy? Drawing from lessons on policy innovation from the Obama administration, I offer reflections based on an intensive nine-month research project for the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). The aim of the project was to gather findings to guide the development of a federal “Innovation Toolkit.” The Toolkit—a digital knowledge-sharing resource for federal employees intended to debut in late 2017—aims not to spur innovation for innovation’s sake, but to encourage the continual evolution of the federal bureaucracy toward a 21st-century government that works better and costs less. This effort to capture the broad range of recent innovative efforts and document how agencies have piloted, iterated, and scaled novel practices is OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO ADOPTION FOR INNOVATIONS IN POLICY","PeriodicalId":422331,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming Barriers to Adoption for Innovations in Policy\",\"authors\":\"Caraleigh Holverson\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/inov_a_00257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"likely not the first institution that comes to mind when considering agile, adaptive, and innovative new initiatives, but numerous federal departments and agencies have in fact been quietly moving toward such frameworks in recent years. This raises two questions: What does innovation look like in the current federal context? How can innovation thrive in a diverse, segmented, institutionally constrained, and risk-averse bureaucracy? Drawing from lessons on policy innovation from the Obama administration, I offer reflections based on an intensive nine-month research project for the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). The aim of the project was to gather findings to guide the development of a federal “Innovation Toolkit.” The Toolkit—a digital knowledge-sharing resource for federal employees intended to debut in late 2017—aims not to spur innovation for innovation’s sake, but to encourage the continual evolution of the federal bureaucracy toward a 21st-century government that works better and costs less. This effort to capture the broad range of recent innovative efforts and document how agencies have piloted, iterated, and scaled novel practices is OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO ADOPTION FOR INNOVATIONS IN POLICY\",\"PeriodicalId\":422331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在考虑敏捷、自适应和创新的新计划时,可能不是第一个想到的机构,但近年来,许多联邦部门和机构实际上一直在悄悄地向此类框架迈进。这就提出了两个问题:在当前的联邦背景下,创新是什么样子的?创新如何在一个多样化、分段化、制度受限、厌恶风险的官僚体系中茁壮成长?借鉴奥巴马政府在政策创新方面的经验,我在为科技政策办公室(OSTP)进行的为期9个月的密集研究项目的基础上提出了一些思考。该项目的目的是收集调查结果,以指导联邦“创新工具包”的开发。工具包是一个为联邦雇员提供的数字知识共享资源,计划于2017年底推出,其目的不是为了刺激创新而创新,而是鼓励联邦官僚机构不断向21世纪的政府发展,以实现更好的工作和更低的成本。这一努力捕捉了最近广泛的创新努力,并记录了各机构如何试点、迭代和扩展新实践,克服了政策创新采用的障碍
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overcoming Barriers to Adoption for Innovations in Policy
likely not the first institution that comes to mind when considering agile, adaptive, and innovative new initiatives, but numerous federal departments and agencies have in fact been quietly moving toward such frameworks in recent years. This raises two questions: What does innovation look like in the current federal context? How can innovation thrive in a diverse, segmented, institutionally constrained, and risk-averse bureaucracy? Drawing from lessons on policy innovation from the Obama administration, I offer reflections based on an intensive nine-month research project for the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). The aim of the project was to gather findings to guide the development of a federal “Innovation Toolkit.” The Toolkit—a digital knowledge-sharing resource for federal employees intended to debut in late 2017—aims not to spur innovation for innovation’s sake, but to encourage the continual evolution of the federal bureaucracy toward a 21st-century government that works better and costs less. This effort to capture the broad range of recent innovative efforts and document how agencies have piloted, iterated, and scaled novel practices is OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO ADOPTION FOR INNOVATIONS IN POLICY
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信