网格视觉质量评估指标:比较研究

Ilyass Abouelaziz, A. Chetouani, M. Hassouni, H. Cherifi
{"title":"网格视觉质量评估指标:比较研究","authors":"Ilyass Abouelaziz, A. Chetouani, M. Hassouni, H. Cherifi","doi":"10.1109/SITIS.2017.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"3D graphics technologies have known a developed progress in the last years, and several processing operations can be applied on 3D meshes such as watermarking, compression, simplification and so forth. Mesh visual quality assessment becomes an important issue to evaluate the visual appearance of the 3D shape after specific modifications. Several metrics have been proposed in this context, from the classical distance-based metrics to the perceptual-based metrics which include perceptual information about the human visual system. In this paper, we propose to study the performance of several mesh visual quality metrics. First, the comparison is conducted regardless the distortion types neither the areas where these distortions are applied. Then, the degradation applied on the whole objects are considered. Finally, the comparison is conducted considering specific areas (smooth and rough). This study allows us to determine which metric is appropriate for such attribute. Experiments are conducted on the General-Purpose database and show that correlation score may vary by changing the attributes.","PeriodicalId":153165,"journal":{"name":"2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesh Visual Quality Assessment Metrics: A Comparison Study\",\"authors\":\"Ilyass Abouelaziz, A. Chetouani, M. Hassouni, H. Cherifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SITIS.2017.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"3D graphics technologies have known a developed progress in the last years, and several processing operations can be applied on 3D meshes such as watermarking, compression, simplification and so forth. Mesh visual quality assessment becomes an important issue to evaluate the visual appearance of the 3D shape after specific modifications. Several metrics have been proposed in this context, from the classical distance-based metrics to the perceptual-based metrics which include perceptual information about the human visual system. In this paper, we propose to study the performance of several mesh visual quality metrics. First, the comparison is conducted regardless the distortion types neither the areas where these distortions are applied. Then, the degradation applied on the whole objects are considered. Finally, the comparison is conducted considering specific areas (smooth and rough). This study allows us to determine which metric is appropriate for such attribute. Experiments are conducted on the General-Purpose database and show that correlation score may vary by changing the attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2017.55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2017.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

近年来,三维图形技术有了长足的发展,在三维网格上可以进行水印、压缩、简化等处理操作。网格视觉质量评价是评价特定修改后三维形状视觉外观的一个重要问题。在这种情况下,已经提出了几种度量,从经典的基于距离的度量到基于感知的度量,其中包括关于人类视觉系统的感知信息。在本文中,我们建议研究几种网格视觉质量度量的性能。首先,无论失真类型如何,也无论这些失真应用的区域如何,都进行了比较。然后,考虑了整个目标的退化问题。最后,根据具体区域(光滑和粗糙)进行对比。这项研究使我们能够确定哪个度量标准适合这种属性。在通用数据库上进行了实验,结果表明,随着属性的改变,相关分数会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mesh Visual Quality Assessment Metrics: A Comparison Study
3D graphics technologies have known a developed progress in the last years, and several processing operations can be applied on 3D meshes such as watermarking, compression, simplification and so forth. Mesh visual quality assessment becomes an important issue to evaluate the visual appearance of the 3D shape after specific modifications. Several metrics have been proposed in this context, from the classical distance-based metrics to the perceptual-based metrics which include perceptual information about the human visual system. In this paper, we propose to study the performance of several mesh visual quality metrics. First, the comparison is conducted regardless the distortion types neither the areas where these distortions are applied. Then, the degradation applied on the whole objects are considered. Finally, the comparison is conducted considering specific areas (smooth and rough). This study allows us to determine which metric is appropriate for such attribute. Experiments are conducted on the General-Purpose database and show that correlation score may vary by changing the attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信