以认知冲突为基础的物理学习工具的发展,以提高学习者的科学推理能力

Baiq Mia Rexa Liani, Syahrial Ayub, W. Wahyudi, M. Makhrus
{"title":"以认知冲突为基础的物理学习工具的发展,以提高学习者的科学推理能力","authors":"Baiq Mia Rexa Liani, Syahrial Ayub, W. Wahyudi, M. Makhrus","doi":"10.29303/jppfi.v3i2.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of physics learning tools based on cognitive conflict approach to improve students' scientific argumentation skills. The type of research used is Research and Development (R&D) with a 3D-based development model design consisting of 3 stages starting from Define, Design, and Develop. The product developed in this study is a learning device consisting of a syllabus, Learning Implementation Plan (RPP), Student Worksheets (LKPD), and test instruments. The feasibility of the learning device was obtained from the assessment of the validation questionnaire by the validator of physics lecturers and physics teachers. The assessment of the validation questionnaire produces qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data produces suggestions and inputs that are used as references to improve the learning tools developed. While the quantitative data is processed to get the value of validity and reliability. The quantitative data from the validation by the lecturers shows that the syllabus, lesson plans, and LKPD are in the very valid category and the test instrument shows a valid category. Meanwhile, the results of teacher validation showed that all the learning tools developed were in the very valid category. Data processing for reliability using the method Borich, known as the Percentage Agreement (PA). Reliability value of all learning tools, whether validated by lecturers or teachers, shows a reliable category because they have a value of more than 75%.","PeriodicalId":430441,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik\",\"authors\":\"Baiq Mia Rexa Liani, Syahrial Ayub, W. Wahyudi, M. Makhrus\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/jppfi.v3i2.122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of physics learning tools based on cognitive conflict approach to improve students' scientific argumentation skills. The type of research used is Research and Development (R&D) with a 3D-based development model design consisting of 3 stages starting from Define, Design, and Develop. The product developed in this study is a learning device consisting of a syllabus, Learning Implementation Plan (RPP), Student Worksheets (LKPD), and test instruments. The feasibility of the learning device was obtained from the assessment of the validation questionnaire by the validator of physics lecturers and physics teachers. The assessment of the validation questionnaire produces qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data produces suggestions and inputs that are used as references to improve the learning tools developed. While the quantitative data is processed to get the value of validity and reliability. The quantitative data from the validation by the lecturers shows that the syllabus, lesson plans, and LKPD are in the very valid category and the test instrument shows a valid category. Meanwhile, the results of teacher validation showed that all the learning tools developed were in the very valid category. Data processing for reliability using the method Borich, known as the Percentage Agreement (PA). Reliability value of all learning tools, whether validated by lecturers or teachers, shows a reliable category because they have a value of more than 75%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppfi.v3i2.122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppfi.v3i2.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定基于认知冲突方法的物理学习工具对提高学生科学论证能力的可行性。使用的研究类型是研究和开发(R&D),具有基于3d的开发模型设计,包括从定义,设计和开发开始的3个阶段。本研究开发的产品是一个由教学大纲、学习实施计划(RPP)、学生工作表(LKPD)和测试仪器组成的学习设备。通过物理讲师和物理教师的验证者对验证问卷的评估,得出学习装置的可行性。验证问卷的评估产生定性和定量数据。定性数据产生建议和输入,用作参考,以改进开发的学习工具。同时对定量数据进行处理,得到效度和信度值。讲师验证的定量数据表明,教学大纲、教案和LKPD属于非常有效的类别,测试仪器显示为有效的类别。同时,教师验证的结果表明,所有开发的学习工具都处于非常有效的类别。数据处理的可靠性使用Borich方法,称为百分比协议(PA)。所有学习工具的可靠性值,无论是经过讲师还是教师的验证,都显示为可靠类别,因为它们的值大于75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik
The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of physics learning tools based on cognitive conflict approach to improve students' scientific argumentation skills. The type of research used is Research and Development (R&D) with a 3D-based development model design consisting of 3 stages starting from Define, Design, and Develop. The product developed in this study is a learning device consisting of a syllabus, Learning Implementation Plan (RPP), Student Worksheets (LKPD), and test instruments. The feasibility of the learning device was obtained from the assessment of the validation questionnaire by the validator of physics lecturers and physics teachers. The assessment of the validation questionnaire produces qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data produces suggestions and inputs that are used as references to improve the learning tools developed. While the quantitative data is processed to get the value of validity and reliability. The quantitative data from the validation by the lecturers shows that the syllabus, lesson plans, and LKPD are in the very valid category and the test instrument shows a valid category. Meanwhile, the results of teacher validation showed that all the learning tools developed were in the very valid category. Data processing for reliability using the method Borich, known as the Percentage Agreement (PA). Reliability value of all learning tools, whether validated by lecturers or teachers, shows a reliable category because they have a value of more than 75%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信