本杰里自制店

Michael J. Schill
{"title":"本杰里自制店","authors":"Michael J. Schill","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1279317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case examines issues of asset control for Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc., in light of the outstanding takeover offers by Chartwell Investments, Dreyer's Grand, Unilever, and Meadowbrook Lane Capital in January 2000. The case provides a unique opportunity to discuss fundamental firm objectives and the implications of a nontraditional corporate orientation; it reviews the development of Ben & Jerry's strong social consciousness and the takeover-defense mechanisms that maintain management's control of company assets. Students, in the role of outside board members, are invited to review management's performance, estimate the economic cost of its social agenda, and evaluate the implications of takeover-defense strategies. Ultimately, they must take a position on whether Ben & Jerry's should continue to pursue its social agenda independently or accept one of the attractive takeover offers and shift toward greater profit orientation. The case requires relatively little knowledge of finance, and is designed largely to provide a stimulating introduction to the principles of a traditional corporate finance curriculum.","PeriodicalId":302905,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Finance (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ben & Jerry's Homemade\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Schill\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1279317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case examines issues of asset control for Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc., in light of the outstanding takeover offers by Chartwell Investments, Dreyer's Grand, Unilever, and Meadowbrook Lane Capital in January 2000. The case provides a unique opportunity to discuss fundamental firm objectives and the implications of a nontraditional corporate orientation; it reviews the development of Ben & Jerry's strong social consciousness and the takeover-defense mechanisms that maintain management's control of company assets. Students, in the role of outside board members, are invited to review management's performance, estimate the economic cost of its social agenda, and evaluate the implications of takeover-defense strategies. Ultimately, they must take a position on whether Ben & Jerry's should continue to pursue its social agenda independently or accept one of the attractive takeover offers and shift toward greater profit orientation. The case requires relatively little knowledge of finance, and is designed largely to provide a stimulating introduction to the principles of a traditional corporate finance curriculum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Darden Case: Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Darden Case: Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1279317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case: Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1279317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本案例根据Chartwell Investments、Dreyer's Grand、Unilever和Meadowbrook Lane Capital于2000年1月提出的收购要约,研究Ben & Jerry's自制公司的资产控制问题。这个案例提供了一个独特的机会来讨论企业的基本目标和非传统企业导向的含义;回顾了Ben & Jerry强烈的社会意识的形成,以及维持管理层对公司资产控制的收购防御机制。学生,在外部董事会成员的角色,被邀请审查管理层的表现,估计其社会议程的经济成本,并评估收购-防御战略的影响。最终,他们必须对Ben & Jerry’s是应该继续独立追求其社会议程,还是接受其中一个有吸引力的收购要约,转向更大的利润导向,表明立场。本案例对金融知识的要求相对较低,其设计主要是为了对传统企业金融课程的原理提供一个刺激的介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ben & Jerry's Homemade
This case examines issues of asset control for Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc., in light of the outstanding takeover offers by Chartwell Investments, Dreyer's Grand, Unilever, and Meadowbrook Lane Capital in January 2000. The case provides a unique opportunity to discuss fundamental firm objectives and the implications of a nontraditional corporate orientation; it reviews the development of Ben & Jerry's strong social consciousness and the takeover-defense mechanisms that maintain management's control of company assets. Students, in the role of outside board members, are invited to review management's performance, estimate the economic cost of its social agenda, and evaluate the implications of takeover-defense strategies. Ultimately, they must take a position on whether Ben & Jerry's should continue to pursue its social agenda independently or accept one of the attractive takeover offers and shift toward greater profit orientation. The case requires relatively little knowledge of finance, and is designed largely to provide a stimulating introduction to the principles of a traditional corporate finance curriculum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信