{"title":"分析","authors":"R. H. Torres","doi":"10.1142/9789813142343_0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he need for metrics that quantify the scholarly productivity of PhD programs at universities has been a topic extensively debated for quite some time. In fact, in 2001 the Merrill retreat focused on Evaluating Research Productivity. The keynote speaker at that time, Dr. Joan Lorden, stated(1): “In choosing measures for the future, we need to bear in mind our goals. Why are we engaged in a measurement process? Are we asking how to move up in the ranks? Or, do we want to know how we have served the state or advanced our mission?”","PeriodicalId":413414,"journal":{"name":"Future Automation","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"74","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytics\",\"authors\":\"R. H. Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9789813142343_0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"he need for metrics that quantify the scholarly productivity of PhD programs at universities has been a topic extensively debated for quite some time. In fact, in 2001 the Merrill retreat focused on Evaluating Research Productivity. The keynote speaker at that time, Dr. Joan Lorden, stated(1): “In choosing measures for the future, we need to bear in mind our goals. Why are we engaged in a measurement process? Are we asking how to move up in the ranks? Or, do we want to know how we have served the state or advanced our mission?”\",\"PeriodicalId\":413414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Automation\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"74\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Automation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813142343_0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813142343_0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
he need for metrics that quantify the scholarly productivity of PhD programs at universities has been a topic extensively debated for quite some time. In fact, in 2001 the Merrill retreat focused on Evaluating Research Productivity. The keynote speaker at that time, Dr. Joan Lorden, stated(1): “In choosing measures for the future, we need to bear in mind our goals. Why are we engaged in a measurement process? Are we asking how to move up in the ranks? Or, do we want to know how we have served the state or advanced our mission?”
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
