乌托邦时刻

A. Elangovan
{"title":"乌托邦时刻","authors":"A. Elangovan","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199491445.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1946, Rau was appointed as the Constitutional Advisor to the newly formed Constituent Assembly. In this capacity, Rau collated and solicited constitutional ideas from members of the Constituent Assembly and put forward his own as well. In these drafts, one gets a clear sense of Rau’s constitutional thoughts, which was a direct response to the political conflicts that unfolded outside the Constituent Assembly. Rau saw the constitution only as a means to an end, which was ‘development’. In pursuit of this goal, Rau wished for a largely powerful head of the state with wide discretionary powers and a legislature and executive that would be committed to ideas of development. While protecting minority interests were paramount, perhaps, most controversially, Rau privileged the Directive Principles—ideas that needed to guide the lawmakers—rather than the granting of Fundamental Rights.","PeriodicalId":148629,"journal":{"name":"Norms and Politics","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moment of Utopia\",\"authors\":\"A. Elangovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780199491445.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1946, Rau was appointed as the Constitutional Advisor to the newly formed Constituent Assembly. In this capacity, Rau collated and solicited constitutional ideas from members of the Constituent Assembly and put forward his own as well. In these drafts, one gets a clear sense of Rau’s constitutional thoughts, which was a direct response to the political conflicts that unfolded outside the Constituent Assembly. Rau saw the constitution only as a means to an end, which was ‘development’. In pursuit of this goal, Rau wished for a largely powerful head of the state with wide discretionary powers and a legislature and executive that would be committed to ideas of development. While protecting minority interests were paramount, perhaps, most controversially, Rau privileged the Directive Principles—ideas that needed to guide the lawmakers—rather than the granting of Fundamental Rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norms and Politics\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norms and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199491445.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norms and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199491445.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1946年,劳被任命为新成立的制宪会议的宪法顾问。劳以这种身份整理和征求制宪会议成员对宪法的意见,并提出了他自己的意见。在这些草案中,人们可以清楚地感受到劳的宪法思想,这是对制宪会议之外展开的政治冲突的直接回应。劳认为宪法只是达到“发展”目的的一种手段。为了实现这一目标,劳希望有一个非常强大的国家元首,拥有广泛的自由裁量权,以及一个致力于发展理念的立法和行政机构。虽然保护少数人的利益是最重要的,但也许也是最具争议的,劳赋予了指导原则——需要指导立法者的思想——而不是授予基本权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moment of Utopia
In 1946, Rau was appointed as the Constitutional Advisor to the newly formed Constituent Assembly. In this capacity, Rau collated and solicited constitutional ideas from members of the Constituent Assembly and put forward his own as well. In these drafts, one gets a clear sense of Rau’s constitutional thoughts, which was a direct response to the political conflicts that unfolded outside the Constituent Assembly. Rau saw the constitution only as a means to an end, which was ‘development’. In pursuit of this goal, Rau wished for a largely powerful head of the state with wide discretionary powers and a legislature and executive that would be committed to ideas of development. While protecting minority interests were paramount, perhaps, most controversially, Rau privileged the Directive Principles—ideas that needed to guide the lawmakers—rather than the granting of Fundamental Rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信