A. Rahmadhani, Richard, Radhika Isswandhana, Andreas Giovani, R. Syah
{"title":"LoRaWAN作为无人机投送的二次遥测通信系统","authors":"A. Rahmadhani, Richard, Radhika Isswandhana, Andreas Giovani, R. Syah","doi":"10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing popularity of drones inspires some people and companies to start using them as end-to-end package delivery tools. Despite reducing delivery time, drones running on batteries typically have a high power consumption relative to their battery capacity to provide power for motors, flight controller, and communication systems. Most drones do not have communication systems that provide a long-range coverage while preserving the power consumption. Developing a long-range and energy-efficient communication system becomes a main concern of this research. In terms of wireless physical layer technology, LoRa becomes one of the possible options due to its power efficiency. LoRaWAN, a de-facto standard protocol for LoRa intended for wide area networking, can be used for drone delivery application. However, it is not suitable for real-time and control-heavy applications. In this paper, the limits of LoRaWAN as a secondary communication mode for drone delivery system are evaluated. The results show that LoRaWAN protocol can still be used for a semi-real-time telemetry purpose in which it can send 10–20 bytes payload regularly with minimum of 2–3 seconds interval. In terms of coverage, the system can achieve up to 8 km in an urban area as tested, using the lowest spreading factor, considering the imperfection factor from the hardware. The percentage of packet loss using this configuration is still tolerable, i.e., up to 5%.","PeriodicalId":302621,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LoRaWAN as Secondary Telemetry Communication System for Drone Delivery\",\"authors\":\"A. Rahmadhani, Richard, Radhika Isswandhana, Andreas Giovani, R. Syah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasing popularity of drones inspires some people and companies to start using them as end-to-end package delivery tools. Despite reducing delivery time, drones running on batteries typically have a high power consumption relative to their battery capacity to provide power for motors, flight controller, and communication systems. Most drones do not have communication systems that provide a long-range coverage while preserving the power consumption. Developing a long-range and energy-efficient communication system becomes a main concern of this research. In terms of wireless physical layer technology, LoRa becomes one of the possible options due to its power efficiency. LoRaWAN, a de-facto standard protocol for LoRa intended for wide area networking, can be used for drone delivery application. However, it is not suitable for real-time and control-heavy applications. In this paper, the limits of LoRaWAN as a secondary communication mode for drone delivery system are evaluated. The results show that LoRaWAN protocol can still be used for a semi-real-time telemetry purpose in which it can send 10–20 bytes payload regularly with minimum of 2–3 seconds interval. In terms of coverage, the system can achieve up to 8 km in an urban area as tested, using the lowest spreading factor, considering the imperfection factor from the hardware. The percentage of packet loss using this configuration is still tolerable, i.e., up to 5%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
LoRaWAN as Secondary Telemetry Communication System for Drone Delivery
Increasing popularity of drones inspires some people and companies to start using them as end-to-end package delivery tools. Despite reducing delivery time, drones running on batteries typically have a high power consumption relative to their battery capacity to provide power for motors, flight controller, and communication systems. Most drones do not have communication systems that provide a long-range coverage while preserving the power consumption. Developing a long-range and energy-efficient communication system becomes a main concern of this research. In terms of wireless physical layer technology, LoRa becomes one of the possible options due to its power efficiency. LoRaWAN, a de-facto standard protocol for LoRa intended for wide area networking, can be used for drone delivery application. However, it is not suitable for real-time and control-heavy applications. In this paper, the limits of LoRaWAN as a secondary communication mode for drone delivery system are evaluated. The results show that LoRaWAN protocol can still be used for a semi-real-time telemetry purpose in which it can send 10–20 bytes payload regularly with minimum of 2–3 seconds interval. In terms of coverage, the system can achieve up to 8 km in an urban area as tested, using the lowest spreading factor, considering the imperfection factor from the hardware. The percentage of packet loss using this configuration is still tolerable, i.e., up to 5%.