{"title":"成本和费用","authors":"The Rt Hon. Lord Justice Coulson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198822110.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This part of this chapter addresses four areas of debate which have arisen in the reported cases in connection with the costs of adjudication. There is what might be termed the usual position as to costs; the possibility that the adjudicator has an ad hoc jurisdiction to decide costs; and issues arising out of particular contractual provisions noting a potentially important difference between the law in England and Wales and the law in Scotland. Finally there is a section dealing with s108A of the 1996 Act.","PeriodicalId":434490,"journal":{"name":"Coulson on Construction Adjudication","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costs and Fees\",\"authors\":\"The Rt Hon. Lord Justice Coulson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198822110.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This part of this chapter addresses four areas of debate which have arisen in the reported cases in connection with the costs of adjudication. There is what might be termed the usual position as to costs; the possibility that the adjudicator has an ad hoc jurisdiction to decide costs; and issues arising out of particular contractual provisions noting a potentially important difference between the law in England and Wales and the law in Scotland. Finally there is a section dealing with s108A of the 1996 Act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coulson on Construction Adjudication\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coulson on Construction Adjudication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198822110.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coulson on Construction Adjudication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198822110.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This part of this chapter addresses four areas of debate which have arisen in the reported cases in connection with the costs of adjudication. There is what might be termed the usual position as to costs; the possibility that the adjudicator has an ad hoc jurisdiction to decide costs; and issues arising out of particular contractual provisions noting a potentially important difference between the law in England and Wales and the law in Scotland. Finally there is a section dealing with s108A of the 1996 Act.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
