生产

Andrew J. McMichael
{"title":"生产","authors":"Andrew J. McMichael","doi":"10.5040/9781474206051.ch-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"M production, which had fallen very sharply in the final 4 months of 1937, experienced but slight variation during the first half of 1938. In the absence of the seasonal expansion usual during this period, the adjusted Federal Reserve index drifted moderately lower through May. In that month the production of nondurable goods turned upward, and was followed in July by an increase in the output of durable goods. For the remaining months of the year, production of both types of products rose to a point substantially higher than the low of the second quarter; although by the end of the year, total volume of manufacturing output was about 5 percent less than the 1937 average, on a seasonally adjusted basis. Despite the marked recovery in manufacturing operations in the last 6 months of the year, the volume of factory output for 1938 ŵ as nearly one-fourth below that of 1937, according to the Federal Reserve index. Data recently made available by the Bureau of the Census indicate that in 1937 the value of product of all manufacturing industries was 60.7 billion dollars. This was nearly twice the value of output in 1933, and only about 11 percent less than the 1929 value. As prices in 1937 averaged considerably lower than in 1929, the volume of output in 1937 was apparently not far below the 1929 peak, although on a per capita basis it was definitely lower. The population increase in the 8 years was about 7 percent. Only a few major industries produced a larger volume of products in 1938 than in 1937; and, with few exceptions, these gains were small. The changes in the available series for a wide range of industries are shown in figure 9. The difference in the declines in the durable and nondurable goods industries is clear from this chart. Fluctuations in Durable Goods.","PeriodicalId":312280,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol in the Age of Industry, Empire, and War","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. McMichael\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781474206051.ch-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"M production, which had fallen very sharply in the final 4 months of 1937, experienced but slight variation during the first half of 1938. In the absence of the seasonal expansion usual during this period, the adjusted Federal Reserve index drifted moderately lower through May. In that month the production of nondurable goods turned upward, and was followed in July by an increase in the output of durable goods. For the remaining months of the year, production of both types of products rose to a point substantially higher than the low of the second quarter; although by the end of the year, total volume of manufacturing output was about 5 percent less than the 1937 average, on a seasonally adjusted basis. Despite the marked recovery in manufacturing operations in the last 6 months of the year, the volume of factory output for 1938 ŵ as nearly one-fourth below that of 1937, according to the Federal Reserve index. Data recently made available by the Bureau of the Census indicate that in 1937 the value of product of all manufacturing industries was 60.7 billion dollars. This was nearly twice the value of output in 1933, and only about 11 percent less than the 1929 value. As prices in 1937 averaged considerably lower than in 1929, the volume of output in 1937 was apparently not far below the 1929 peak, although on a per capita basis it was definitely lower. The population increase in the 8 years was about 7 percent. Only a few major industries produced a larger volume of products in 1938 than in 1937; and, with few exceptions, these gains were small. The changes in the available series for a wide range of industries are shown in figure 9. The difference in the declines in the durable and nondurable goods industries is clear from this chart. Fluctuations in Durable Goods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol in the Age of Industry, Empire, and War\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol in the Age of Industry, Empire, and War\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474206051.ch-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol in the Age of Industry, Empire, and War","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474206051.ch-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1937年最后4个月急剧下降的M生产,在1938年上半年经历了轻微的变化。由于这一时期通常没有出现季节性扩张,5月份调整后的美联储指数小幅走低。当月,非耐用品的产量开始上升,随后7月份耐用品的产量也有所增加。在今年剩下的几个月里,这两种产品的产量都大大高于第二季度的低点;尽管到年底,制造业总产出比1937年的平均水平低5%左右,在季节性调整的基础上。尽管制造业在去年最后6个月明显复苏,但根据美联储指数,1938年的工厂产出仍比1937年低近四分之一。人口普查局最近提供的数据表明,1937年所有制造业的产品价值为607亿美元。这几乎是1933年产值的两倍,只比1929年的产值少11%左右。由于1937年的平均价格比1929年低得多,1937年的产量显然比1929年的峰值低不了多少,尽管按人均计算肯定更低。8年来人口增长了大约7%。1938年,只有少数几个主要行业的产品产量超过了1937年;而且,除了少数例外,这些收益都很小。图9显示了各种行业可用系列的变化情况。从这张图表中可以清楚地看出耐用品和非耐用品行业下降的差异。耐用品的波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Production
M production, which had fallen very sharply in the final 4 months of 1937, experienced but slight variation during the first half of 1938. In the absence of the seasonal expansion usual during this period, the adjusted Federal Reserve index drifted moderately lower through May. In that month the production of nondurable goods turned upward, and was followed in July by an increase in the output of durable goods. For the remaining months of the year, production of both types of products rose to a point substantially higher than the low of the second quarter; although by the end of the year, total volume of manufacturing output was about 5 percent less than the 1937 average, on a seasonally adjusted basis. Despite the marked recovery in manufacturing operations in the last 6 months of the year, the volume of factory output for 1938 ŵ as nearly one-fourth below that of 1937, according to the Federal Reserve index. Data recently made available by the Bureau of the Census indicate that in 1937 the value of product of all manufacturing industries was 60.7 billion dollars. This was nearly twice the value of output in 1933, and only about 11 percent less than the 1929 value. As prices in 1937 averaged considerably lower than in 1929, the volume of output in 1937 was apparently not far below the 1929 peak, although on a per capita basis it was definitely lower. The population increase in the 8 years was about 7 percent. Only a few major industries produced a larger volume of products in 1938 than in 1937; and, with few exceptions, these gains were small. The changes in the available series for a wide range of industries are shown in figure 9. The difference in the declines in the durable and nondurable goods industries is clear from this chart. Fluctuations in Durable Goods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信