FATF评估有效性、合规性与洗钱风险关系研究

Mei Jin, Zhanhai Wang
{"title":"FATF评估有效性、合规性与洗钱风险关系研究","authors":"Mei Jin, Zhanhai Wang","doi":"10.1109/CBFD52659.2021.00113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Money laundering (ML) provides criminals with a way to legalize the proceeds of crime, which brings great harm to the economic development and financial stability of all countries in the world. As the most authoritative organization in the international anti-money laundering (AML) cooperation system in the world, FATF is responsible for formulating AML related standards and conducting mutual evaluations to examine the compliance and effectiveness of member countries’ AML work. However, FATF has not conduct an overall assessment and systematic comparison of the ML risks faced by countries. The Basel Institute for Governance provides standards for quantifying ML risks in various countries, and uses the Basel AML Index to measure ML risks in different countries. This paper demonstrates the relationship between FATF evaluation data and Basel AML Index, respectively confirms the negative correlation between the effectiveness of AML system, technical compliance and the ML risk faced by various countries. On this basis, this study puts forward suggestions for the ML risk faced by the international community.","PeriodicalId":230625,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Computer, Blockchain and Financial Development (CBFD)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the Relationships Between FATF Assessment Effectiveness, Compliance and Money Laundering Risk\",\"authors\":\"Mei Jin, Zhanhai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBFD52659.2021.00113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Money laundering (ML) provides criminals with a way to legalize the proceeds of crime, which brings great harm to the economic development and financial stability of all countries in the world. As the most authoritative organization in the international anti-money laundering (AML) cooperation system in the world, FATF is responsible for formulating AML related standards and conducting mutual evaluations to examine the compliance and effectiveness of member countries’ AML work. However, FATF has not conduct an overall assessment and systematic comparison of the ML risks faced by countries. The Basel Institute for Governance provides standards for quantifying ML risks in various countries, and uses the Basel AML Index to measure ML risks in different countries. This paper demonstrates the relationship between FATF evaluation data and Basel AML Index, respectively confirms the negative correlation between the effectiveness of AML system, technical compliance and the ML risk faced by various countries. On this basis, this study puts forward suggestions for the ML risk faced by the international community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":230625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Computer, Blockchain and Financial Development (CBFD)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Computer, Blockchain and Financial Development (CBFD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBFD52659.2021.00113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Computer, Blockchain and Financial Development (CBFD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBFD52659.2021.00113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洗钱为犯罪分子提供了将犯罪所得合法化的途径,给世界各国的经济发展和金融稳定带来了极大的危害。FATF是国际反洗钱(AML)合作体系中最权威的组织,负责制定“反洗钱”相关标准,并进行相互评估,检查成员国“反洗钱”工作的合规性和有效性。然而,FATF并未对各国所面临的ML风险进行全面评估和系统比较。巴塞尔治理研究所提供了量化各国ML风险的标准,并使用巴塞尔反洗钱指数来衡量不同国家的ML风险。本文论证了FATF评估数据与巴塞尔反洗钱指数之间的关系,分别证实了各国反洗钱制度有效性、技术合规性与ML风险之间的负相关关系。在此基础上,本研究对国际社会面临的ML风险提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on the Relationships Between FATF Assessment Effectiveness, Compliance and Money Laundering Risk
Money laundering (ML) provides criminals with a way to legalize the proceeds of crime, which brings great harm to the economic development and financial stability of all countries in the world. As the most authoritative organization in the international anti-money laundering (AML) cooperation system in the world, FATF is responsible for formulating AML related standards and conducting mutual evaluations to examine the compliance and effectiveness of member countries’ AML work. However, FATF has not conduct an overall assessment and systematic comparison of the ML risks faced by countries. The Basel Institute for Governance provides standards for quantifying ML risks in various countries, and uses the Basel AML Index to measure ML risks in different countries. This paper demonstrates the relationship between FATF evaluation data and Basel AML Index, respectively confirms the negative correlation between the effectiveness of AML system, technical compliance and the ML risk faced by various countries. On this basis, this study puts forward suggestions for the ML risk faced by the international community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信