精确测量测试模式的小延迟缺陷覆盖率

Narendra Devta-Prasanna, S. Goel, A. Gunda, Mark Ward, P. Krishnamurthy
{"title":"精确测量测试模式的小延迟缺陷覆盖率","authors":"Narendra Devta-Prasanna, S. Goel, A. Gunda, Mark Ward, P. Krishnamurthy","doi":"10.1109/TEST.2009.5355644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small delay defect (SDD) testing is expected to become more prevalent as technology nodes continue to shrink and design frequencies continue to increase. In this paper, we critically examine previously published methods for evaluating SDD coverage and identify their shortcomings as an accurate and practical coverage metric. We propose an accurate method for measuring the coverage of small delay defects by any given pattern set. We demonstrate that the proposed metric overcomes the identified shortcomings of previously published approaches. For several ISCAS and industrial circuits, we generate test patterns and compare their SDD coverage values using different methods. Experimental results also demonstrate that the proposed method is several times faster to compute. Finally, we evaluate different testing strategies for screening small delay defects.","PeriodicalId":419063,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Test Conference","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate measurement of small delay defect coverage of test patterns\",\"authors\":\"Narendra Devta-Prasanna, S. Goel, A. Gunda, Mark Ward, P. Krishnamurthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEST.2009.5355644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small delay defect (SDD) testing is expected to become more prevalent as technology nodes continue to shrink and design frequencies continue to increase. In this paper, we critically examine previously published methods for evaluating SDD coverage and identify their shortcomings as an accurate and practical coverage metric. We propose an accurate method for measuring the coverage of small delay defects by any given pattern set. We demonstrate that the proposed metric overcomes the identified shortcomings of previously published approaches. For several ISCAS and industrial circuits, we generate test patterns and compare their SDD coverage values using different methods. Experimental results also demonstrate that the proposed method is several times faster to compute. Finally, we evaluate different testing strategies for screening small delay defects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Test Conference\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Test Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.2009.5355644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Test Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.2009.5355644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

随着技术节点的不断缩小和设计频率的不断增加,预计小延迟缺陷(SDD)测试将变得更加普遍。在本文中,我们批判性地检查了先前发表的评估SDD覆盖的方法,并确定了它们作为准确和实用的覆盖度量的缺点。我们提出了一种测量任意给定模式集的小延迟缺陷覆盖率的精确方法。我们证明,所提出的度量克服了以前发表的方法所确定的缺点。对于几个ISCAS和工业电路,我们生成测试模式,并使用不同的方法比较它们的SDD覆盖值。实验结果表明,该方法的计算速度提高了数倍。最后,我们评估了筛选小延迟缺陷的不同测试策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accurate measurement of small delay defect coverage of test patterns
Small delay defect (SDD) testing is expected to become more prevalent as technology nodes continue to shrink and design frequencies continue to increase. In this paper, we critically examine previously published methods for evaluating SDD coverage and identify their shortcomings as an accurate and practical coverage metric. We propose an accurate method for measuring the coverage of small delay defects by any given pattern set. We demonstrate that the proposed metric overcomes the identified shortcomings of previously published approaches. For several ISCAS and industrial circuits, we generate test patterns and compare their SDD coverage values using different methods. Experimental results also demonstrate that the proposed method is several times faster to compute. Finally, we evaluate different testing strategies for screening small delay defects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信