事实的虚构再现:奇曼达·阿迪奇的《美国人》中的记忆与控诉

Onyeka Ike, O. O. Otu
{"title":"事实的虚构再现:奇曼达·阿迪奇的《美国人》中的记忆与控诉","authors":"Onyeka Ike, O. O. Otu","doi":"10.4314/ejotmas.v8i1-2.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chimamanda Adichie’s Americanah has received a wide range of criticisms from feminist, postcolonial, even from psychoanalytic perspectives, etc.,  but not really from the New Historicist evaluation which usually offers the opportunity for a panoramic historical interpretations of literary texts.  Such interpretations usually enable readers to have a broader understanding of some vital actual historical developments being fictionalized in a  literary text to learn from the mistakes of the past with regard to certain actions of individuals and institutions in society. In an attempt to achieve  this, the study establishes the relationship between the characters, settings, incidents, and even some discourses created and represented in the  novel with factual historical and contemporary political figures and issues related to them. The crystallizing issues from the author’s literary  searchlight in this regard principally border on former President Obasanjo’s controversial privatization programme, General Babangida’s political  and economic maradonism, particularly his IMF/SAP-inflicted economic sores and sufferings and the historically suspicious plane crash under his   administration, as well as several other sensitive and indicting issues associated with dictatorship, ethnicity and racism, among others. The study  maintains that as an insightful creative writer and a reminder of history, Adichie dutifully stands on the watchtower of society, remembering and  making certain significant indictments with the instrumentality of her novelistic art in focus, and that such representations can only be said to be  fruitful or serve their cardinal intent when individuals in society learn from them and avoid recurrences. ","PeriodicalId":333241,"journal":{"name":"EJOTMAS: Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fictional representation of facts: Memory and indictment in Chimamanda Adichie’s Americanah\",\"authors\":\"Onyeka Ike, O. O. Otu\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ejotmas.v8i1-2.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chimamanda Adichie’s Americanah has received a wide range of criticisms from feminist, postcolonial, even from psychoanalytic perspectives, etc.,  but not really from the New Historicist evaluation which usually offers the opportunity for a panoramic historical interpretations of literary texts.  Such interpretations usually enable readers to have a broader understanding of some vital actual historical developments being fictionalized in a  literary text to learn from the mistakes of the past with regard to certain actions of individuals and institutions in society. In an attempt to achieve  this, the study establishes the relationship between the characters, settings, incidents, and even some discourses created and represented in the  novel with factual historical and contemporary political figures and issues related to them. The crystallizing issues from the author’s literary  searchlight in this regard principally border on former President Obasanjo’s controversial privatization programme, General Babangida’s political  and economic maradonism, particularly his IMF/SAP-inflicted economic sores and sufferings and the historically suspicious plane crash under his   administration, as well as several other sensitive and indicting issues associated with dictatorship, ethnicity and racism, among others. The study  maintains that as an insightful creative writer and a reminder of history, Adichie dutifully stands on the watchtower of society, remembering and  making certain significant indictments with the instrumentality of her novelistic art in focus, and that such representations can only be said to be  fruitful or serve their cardinal intent when individuals in society learn from them and avoid recurrences. \",\"PeriodicalId\":333241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJOTMAS: Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJOTMAS: Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejotmas.v8i1-2.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJOTMAS: Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejotmas.v8i1-2.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Chimamanda Adichie的《美国人》受到了来自女权主义、后殖民主义、甚至精神分析等方面的广泛批评,但新历史主义的评价却没有受到批评,新历史主义的评价通常为文学文本提供了全景历史解释的机会。这种解释通常使读者对文学作品中虚构的一些重要的实际历史发展有更广泛的理解,并从过去个人和社会机构的某些行为中吸取教训。为了达到这一目的,本研究将小说中所创造和表现的人物、背景、事件,甚至一些话语与真实的历史和当代政治人物及其相关问题建立联系。在这方面,从作者的文学作品中可以看到的具体问题主要是前总统奥巴桑乔的有争议的私有化方案、巴班吉达将军的政治和经济马拉多纳主义,特别是他的货币基金组织/南非社会党造成的经济痛苦和历史上可疑的飞机失事,以及与独裁、种族和种族主义等有关的其他几个敏感和起诉问题。该研究认为,作为一个富有洞察力的有创造力的作家和历史的提醒者,阿迪契忠实地站在社会的瞭望塔上,用她的小说艺术的工具来记住和做出某些重要的控诉,只有当社会中的个人从中学习并避免重复时,这样的陈述才能被认为是富有成效的或服务于他们的主要意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fictional representation of facts: Memory and indictment in Chimamanda Adichie’s Americanah
Chimamanda Adichie’s Americanah has received a wide range of criticisms from feminist, postcolonial, even from psychoanalytic perspectives, etc.,  but not really from the New Historicist evaluation which usually offers the opportunity for a panoramic historical interpretations of literary texts.  Such interpretations usually enable readers to have a broader understanding of some vital actual historical developments being fictionalized in a  literary text to learn from the mistakes of the past with regard to certain actions of individuals and institutions in society. In an attempt to achieve  this, the study establishes the relationship between the characters, settings, incidents, and even some discourses created and represented in the  novel with factual historical and contemporary political figures and issues related to them. The crystallizing issues from the author’s literary  searchlight in this regard principally border on former President Obasanjo’s controversial privatization programme, General Babangida’s political  and economic maradonism, particularly his IMF/SAP-inflicted economic sores and sufferings and the historically suspicious plane crash under his   administration, as well as several other sensitive and indicting issues associated with dictatorship, ethnicity and racism, among others. The study  maintains that as an insightful creative writer and a reminder of history, Adichie dutifully stands on the watchtower of society, remembering and  making certain significant indictments with the instrumentality of her novelistic art in focus, and that such representations can only be said to be  fruitful or serve their cardinal intent when individuals in society learn from them and avoid recurrences. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信