燃料电池混合动力系统无人机能量管理策略比较分析

M. S. Elkerdany, I. Safwat, A. Youssef, M. Elkhatib
{"title":"燃料电池混合动力系统无人机能量管理策略比较分析","authors":"M. S. Elkerdany, I. Safwat, A. Youssef, M. Elkhatib","doi":"10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid electric UAVs rely heavily on energy manage-ment strategy (EMS). For a small UAV fuel-cell (FC) hybrid system, a comparison of four EMSs is presented in this paper. The FC, lithium-ion battery, and dc/dc converters comprise the hybrid system. The management of hybrid electric power flow based on changes in load power and battery state of charge (SOC) is an important part of these strategies. The energy management schemes considered in this paper are the most commonly used energy management schemes in fuel-cell based UAVs, and they include the following: the classical proportional-integral (PI) control (CPIC) strategy, the state machine control (SMC) strategy, the rule-based fuzzy logic (RBFL) strategy, and an intelligent technique based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy control strategy (ANFIS). There are two primary metrics for comparing performance, hydrogen consumption and battery SOC (BSOC), which impacts their life cycle. Such an EMS should be designed to maximise fuel efficiency while also making sure each energy source is used responsibly. MATLAB/Simulink software is used to conduct an in-depth study of a simulated model. For better usage of hybrid system's energy, EMS identifies variations in transient load current, as well as fuel-cell power. These investi-gations give insight on EMS work and the power flow in hybrid power systems. The trade-off choice between EMS is ensuring optimal performance in accordance with selected criterion.","PeriodicalId":219988,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Energy Management Strategies for a Fuel-Cell Hybrid Electric System UAV\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Elkerdany, I. Safwat, A. Youssef, M. Elkhatib\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hybrid electric UAVs rely heavily on energy manage-ment strategy (EMS). For a small UAV fuel-cell (FC) hybrid system, a comparison of four EMSs is presented in this paper. The FC, lithium-ion battery, and dc/dc converters comprise the hybrid system. The management of hybrid electric power flow based on changes in load power and battery state of charge (SOC) is an important part of these strategies. The energy management schemes considered in this paper are the most commonly used energy management schemes in fuel-cell based UAVs, and they include the following: the classical proportional-integral (PI) control (CPIC) strategy, the state machine control (SMC) strategy, the rule-based fuzzy logic (RBFL) strategy, and an intelligent technique based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy control strategy (ANFIS). There are two primary metrics for comparing performance, hydrogen consumption and battery SOC (BSOC), which impacts their life cycle. Such an EMS should be designed to maximise fuel efficiency while also making sure each energy source is used responsibly. MATLAB/Simulink software is used to conduct an in-depth study of a simulated model. For better usage of hybrid system's energy, EMS identifies variations in transient load current, as well as fuel-cell power. These investi-gations give insight on EMS work and the power flow in hybrid power systems. The trade-off choice between EMS is ensuring optimal performance in accordance with selected criterion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混合动力无人机在很大程度上依赖于能量管理策略(EMS)。针对一种小型无人机燃料电池(FC)混合动力系统,对四种电磁系统进行了比较。混合系统由FC、锂离子电池和dc/dc转换器组成。基于负载功率和电池荷电状态(SOC)变化的混合潮流管理是这些策略的重要组成部分。本文研究的能量管理方案是燃料电池无人机中最常用的能量管理方案,包括经典的比例积分(PI)控制(CPIC)策略、状态机控制(SMC)策略、基于规则的模糊逻辑(RBFL)策略和基于自适应神经模糊控制策略(ANFIS)的智能技术。比较性能有两个主要指标,即氢消耗和电池SOC (BSOC),这两个指标会影响它们的生命周期。这样的环境管理系统的设计应最大限度地提高燃油效率,同时确保每一种能源都得到负责任的使用。利用MATLAB/Simulink软件对仿真模型进行深入研究。为了更好地利用混合动力系统的能量,EMS可以识别瞬时负载电流和燃料电池功率的变化。这些调查提供了洞察EMS工作和潮流的混合电力系统。EMS之间的权衡选择是根据所选标准确保最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Energy Management Strategies for a Fuel-Cell Hybrid Electric System UAV
Hybrid electric UAVs rely heavily on energy manage-ment strategy (EMS). For a small UAV fuel-cell (FC) hybrid system, a comparison of four EMSs is presented in this paper. The FC, lithium-ion battery, and dc/dc converters comprise the hybrid system. The management of hybrid electric power flow based on changes in load power and battery state of charge (SOC) is an important part of these strategies. The energy management schemes considered in this paper are the most commonly used energy management schemes in fuel-cell based UAVs, and they include the following: the classical proportional-integral (PI) control (CPIC) strategy, the state machine control (SMC) strategy, the rule-based fuzzy logic (RBFL) strategy, and an intelligent technique based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy control strategy (ANFIS). There are two primary metrics for comparing performance, hydrogen consumption and battery SOC (BSOC), which impacts their life cycle. Such an EMS should be designed to maximise fuel efficiency while also making sure each energy source is used responsibly. MATLAB/Simulink software is used to conduct an in-depth study of a simulated model. For better usage of hybrid system's energy, EMS identifies variations in transient load current, as well as fuel-cell power. These investi-gations give insight on EMS work and the power flow in hybrid power systems. The trade-off choice between EMS is ensuring optimal performance in accordance with selected criterion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信