手指绘制图形密码验证方法的比较评价

M. Martinez-Diaz, C. Martin-Diaz, Javier Galbally, Julian Fierrez
{"title":"手指绘制图形密码验证方法的比较评价","authors":"M. Martinez-Diaz, C. Martin-Diaz, Javier Galbally, Julian Fierrez","doi":"10.1109/ICFHR.2010.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Doodle-based graphical passwords represent a challenging scenario due to their high variability and the tendency to be graphically simple. Despite this, doodle-based authentication using touch screens is a promising lightweight user verification method. Several works have been published in this field, although they report in general experimental verification results over small and private databases. In this paper we analyze the performance of several state-of-the-art systems for doodle verification, using the recently acquired DooDB database, which is publicly available. Several algorithms are tested, from the fields of gesture recognition and doodle and signature verification. A comparative study of their performance is done, and future research directions are pointed out.","PeriodicalId":335044,"journal":{"name":"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Evaluation of Finger-Drawn Graphical Password Verification Methods\",\"authors\":\"M. Martinez-Diaz, C. Martin-Diaz, Javier Galbally, Julian Fierrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICFHR.2010.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Doodle-based graphical passwords represent a challenging scenario due to their high variability and the tendency to be graphically simple. Despite this, doodle-based authentication using touch screens is a promising lightweight user verification method. Several works have been published in this field, although they report in general experimental verification results over small and private databases. In this paper we analyze the performance of several state-of-the-art systems for doodle verification, using the recently acquired DooDB database, which is publicly available. Several algorithms are tested, from the fields of gesture recognition and doodle and signature verification. A comparative study of their performance is done, and future research directions are pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2010.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2010.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

基于涂鸦的图形密码由于其高度可变性和图形化简单的趋势,代表了一个具有挑战性的场景。尽管如此,使用触摸屏的基于涂鸦的身份验证是一种很有前途的轻量级用户验证方法。在这个领域已经发表了一些著作,尽管它们一般报告了小型和私人数据库的实验验证结果。在本文中,我们使用最近获得的公开可用的DooDB数据库,分析了几个最先进的doodle验证系统的性能。从手势识别和涂鸦和签名验证领域测试了几种算法。对它们的性能进行了比较研究,并指出了今后的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Evaluation of Finger-Drawn Graphical Password Verification Methods
Doodle-based graphical passwords represent a challenging scenario due to their high variability and the tendency to be graphically simple. Despite this, doodle-based authentication using touch screens is a promising lightweight user verification method. Several works have been published in this field, although they report in general experimental verification results over small and private databases. In this paper we analyze the performance of several state-of-the-art systems for doodle verification, using the recently acquired DooDB database, which is publicly available. Several algorithms are tested, from the fields of gesture recognition and doodle and signature verification. A comparative study of their performance is done, and future research directions are pointed out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信