国际法在南非城市法中的法律地位:津巴布韦共和国政府诉菲克等人(657/11)[2012]Zasca 122

Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko
{"title":"国际法在南非城市法中的法律地位:津巴布韦共和国政府诉菲克等人(657/11)[2012]Zasca 122","authors":"Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2639290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Southern Africa Development Community Tribunal (SADC Tribunal) was formed in terms of article 2 of the Protocol on Tribunal and Rules of Procedure thereof (SADC Protocol on the Tribunal) to ensure adherence to and proper interpretation of the Treaty of the Southern African Development Community (SADC Treaty) and its subsidiary instruments, and to adjudicate disputes referred to it? In terms of the provisions of article 16(5) of the SADC Treaty and article 32(3) of the SADC Protocol on the Tribunal, the decisions of the SADC Tribunal are final and binding to the parties in dispute. The SADC Tribunal has issued various judgments against the Republic of Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe); however, there has been no compliance with its decisions by Zimbabwe. Frustrated by unsuccessful efforts to register and enforce the rulings of the SADC Tribunal before the domestic courts of Zimbabwe, the applicants decided to approach the South African courts in an attempt to register and enforce the decisions of the Tribunal. This article discusses the legal status of international law in South Africa's municipal law in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal, South Africa (SCA) in the matter between the Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Fick and Others.","PeriodicalId":329462,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Status of International Law in South Africa's Municipal Law: Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Fick and Others (657/11) [2012] Zasca 122\",\"authors\":\"Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2639290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Southern Africa Development Community Tribunal (SADC Tribunal) was formed in terms of article 2 of the Protocol on Tribunal and Rules of Procedure thereof (SADC Protocol on the Tribunal) to ensure adherence to and proper interpretation of the Treaty of the Southern African Development Community (SADC Treaty) and its subsidiary instruments, and to adjudicate disputes referred to it? In terms of the provisions of article 16(5) of the SADC Treaty and article 32(3) of the SADC Protocol on the Tribunal, the decisions of the SADC Tribunal are final and binding to the parties in dispute. The SADC Tribunal has issued various judgments against the Republic of Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe); however, there has been no compliance with its decisions by Zimbabwe. Frustrated by unsuccessful efforts to register and enforce the rulings of the SADC Tribunal before the domestic courts of Zimbabwe, the applicants decided to approach the South African courts in an attempt to register and enforce the decisions of the Tribunal. This article discusses the legal status of international law in South Africa's municipal law in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal, South Africa (SCA) in the matter between the Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Fick and Others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2639290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Adjudication (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2639290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

南部非洲发展共同体法庭(南部非洲发展共同体法庭)是根据《关于法庭及其议事规则的议定书》(《南部非洲发展共同体法庭议定书》)第2条成立的,目的是确保遵守《南部非洲发展共同体条约》(《南部非洲发展共同体条约》)及其附属文书并对提交法庭的争端作出裁决。根据《南共体条约》第16(5)条和《南共体法庭议定书》第32(3)条的规定,南共体法庭的裁决是终局的,对争端各方具有约束力。南部非洲共同体法庭对津巴布韦共和国(津巴布韦)作出了多项判决;但是,津巴布韦没有遵守委员会的决定。由于在津巴布韦国内法院登记和执行南共体法庭裁决的努力失败,申请人决定向南非法院提出申请,试图登记和执行法庭的裁决。本文根据南非最高上诉法院对津巴布韦共和国政府诉菲克及其他人一案的判决,讨论国际法在南非国内法中的法律地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Status of International Law in South Africa's Municipal Law: Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Fick and Others (657/11) [2012] Zasca 122
The Southern Africa Development Community Tribunal (SADC Tribunal) was formed in terms of article 2 of the Protocol on Tribunal and Rules of Procedure thereof (SADC Protocol on the Tribunal) to ensure adherence to and proper interpretation of the Treaty of the Southern African Development Community (SADC Treaty) and its subsidiary instruments, and to adjudicate disputes referred to it? In terms of the provisions of article 16(5) of the SADC Treaty and article 32(3) of the SADC Protocol on the Tribunal, the decisions of the SADC Tribunal are final and binding to the parties in dispute. The SADC Tribunal has issued various judgments against the Republic of Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe); however, there has been no compliance with its decisions by Zimbabwe. Frustrated by unsuccessful efforts to register and enforce the rulings of the SADC Tribunal before the domestic courts of Zimbabwe, the applicants decided to approach the South African courts in an attempt to register and enforce the decisions of the Tribunal. This article discusses the legal status of international law in South Africa's municipal law in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal, South Africa (SCA) in the matter between the Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Fick and Others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信