{"title":"性犯罪者的否认和最小化","authors":"R. Rogers, R. Dickey","doi":"10.1177/107906329100400103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defensiveness in sex offenders (DISO), although a very common phenomenon, is poorly understood by clinicians. Three explanatory models of DISO are explored. Thepathogenic model postulates from a psychodynamic perspective massive repression and denial are operative in the service of ego functions. Thecriminogenic model associates deception with the antisocial characteristics of sex offenders. Theadaptational model assumes that the sex offender is faced with a highly adversarial setting and chooses defensiveness based on its expected utility. Models of malingering are compared and implications of DISO for clinical treatment and management are discussed.","PeriodicalId":340989,"journal":{"name":"Annals of sex research","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Denial and minimization among sex offenders\",\"authors\":\"R. Rogers, R. Dickey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/107906329100400103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defensiveness in sex offenders (DISO), although a very common phenomenon, is poorly understood by clinicians. Three explanatory models of DISO are explored. Thepathogenic model postulates from a psychodynamic perspective massive repression and denial are operative in the service of ego functions. Thecriminogenic model associates deception with the antisocial characteristics of sex offenders. Theadaptational model assumes that the sex offender is faced with a highly adversarial setting and chooses defensiveness based on its expected utility. Models of malingering are compared and implications of DISO for clinical treatment and management are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of sex research\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of sex research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329100400103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of sex research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329100400103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defensiveness in sex offenders (DISO), although a very common phenomenon, is poorly understood by clinicians. Three explanatory models of DISO are explored. Thepathogenic model postulates from a psychodynamic perspective massive repression and denial are operative in the service of ego functions. Thecriminogenic model associates deception with the antisocial characteristics of sex offenders. Theadaptational model assumes that the sex offender is faced with a highly adversarial setting and chooses defensiveness based on its expected utility. Models of malingering are compared and implications of DISO for clinical treatment and management are discussed.