人权与国际投资仲裁

U. Kriebaum
{"title":"人权与国际投资仲裁","authors":"U. Kriebaum","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses the role of human rights in international\n investment arbitration. The treatment of human rights issues by\n investment tribunals has received increased attention in recent years,\n especially from the academic world. This is particularly so because\n tribunals have adopted varying approaches when confronted with human\n rights-based arguments. Some have responded in a negative way, declining\n to exercise jurisdiction when human rights were concerned. Others\n declined to discuss human rights arguments, noting that investment\n protection provisions were more favourable to investors than human\n rights law. Others applied human rights law where it composed part of\n the applicable law by virtue of the host State being a party to a human\n rights treaty. And some, when interpreting investment protection\n treaties, drew inspiration from approaches used by human rights courts,\n despite the decisive human rights treaty not being in force in the host\n state in the case at hand. The chapter then reflects upon the\n requirements for the application of human rights law in investment\n disputes.","PeriodicalId":448349,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"U. Kriebaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter assesses the role of human rights in international\\n investment arbitration. The treatment of human rights issues by\\n investment tribunals has received increased attention in recent years,\\n especially from the academic world. This is particularly so because\\n tribunals have adopted varying approaches when confronted with human\\n rights-based arguments. Some have responded in a negative way, declining\\n to exercise jurisdiction when human rights were concerned. Others\\n declined to discuss human rights arguments, noting that investment\\n protection provisions were more favourable to investors than human\\n rights law. Others applied human rights law where it composed part of\\n the applicable law by virtue of the host State being a party to a human\\n rights treaty. And some, when interpreting investment protection\\n treaties, drew inspiration from approaches used by human rights courts,\\n despite the decisive human rights treaty not being in force in the host\\n state in the case at hand. The chapter then reflects upon the\\n requirements for the application of human rights law in investment\\n disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章评估人权在国际投资仲裁中的作用。近年来,投资法庭对人权问题的处理受到越来越多的关注,尤其是来自学术界的关注。这一点尤其如此,因为法庭在面对基于人权的论点时采取了不同的方法。有些国家的反应是消极的,在涉及人权的问题上拒绝行使管辖权。其他人拒绝讨论人权方面的论点,指出投资保护条款比人权法更有利于投资者。其他国家则适用人权法,因为东道国是一项人权条约的缔约国,因此人权法是适用法律的一部分。还有一些人在解释投资保护条约时,从人权法院使用的方法中获得灵感,尽管决定性的人权条约在本案的东道国尚未生效。然后,本章反思了在投资纠纷中适用人权法的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration
This chapter assesses the role of human rights in international investment arbitration. The treatment of human rights issues by investment tribunals has received increased attention in recent years, especially from the academic world. This is particularly so because tribunals have adopted varying approaches when confronted with human rights-based arguments. Some have responded in a negative way, declining to exercise jurisdiction when human rights were concerned. Others declined to discuss human rights arguments, noting that investment protection provisions were more favourable to investors than human rights law. Others applied human rights law where it composed part of the applicable law by virtue of the host State being a party to a human rights treaty. And some, when interpreting investment protection treaties, drew inspiration from approaches used by human rights courts, despite the decisive human rights treaty not being in force in the host state in the case at hand. The chapter then reflects upon the requirements for the application of human rights law in investment disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信