支持“好”(或至少“更好”)的死亡:超越偏好、程序和协议

The Caregiver Journal Pub Date : 1997-07-01 DOI:10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776

D. B. McCurdy

{"title":"支持“好”(或至少“更好”)的死亡:超越偏好、程序和协议","authors":"D. B. McCurdy","doi":"10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consensus view that the SUPPORT project “failed” should not obscure the significance of the effort itself—or its importance for chaplains. The author sketches two sets of concerns SUPPORT raises for chaplains and for pastoral care in health care. He describes some distinctive challenges these concerns create for chaplains.","PeriodicalId":252852,"journal":{"name":"The Caregiver Journal","volume":"862 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting A “Good” (or at Least “Better”) Death: Beyond Preferences, Procedures, and Protocols\",\"authors\":\"D. B. McCurdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The consensus view that the SUPPORT project “failed” should not obscure the significance of the effort itself—or its importance for chaplains. The author sketches two sets of concerns SUPPORT raises for chaplains and for pastoral care in health care. He describes some distinctive challenges these concerns create for chaplains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Caregiver Journal\",\"volume\":\"862 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Caregiver Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Caregiver Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1077842X.1997.10781776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

支持项目“失败”的共识不应该掩盖努力本身的意义——或者它对牧师的重要性。作者概述了两组关注支持提出的牧师和教牧关怀在卫生保健。他描述了这些担忧给牧师带来的一些独特挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Supporting A “Good” (or at Least “Better”) Death: Beyond Preferences, Procedures, and Protocols

The consensus view that the SUPPORT project “failed” should not obscure the significance of the effort itself—or its importance for chaplains. The author sketches two sets of concerns SUPPORT raises for chaplains and for pastoral care in health care. He describes some distinctive challenges these concerns create for chaplains.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Caregiver Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量