分解TripAdvisor:在大数据时代发现潜在的欺诈性酒店评论

Christopher G. Harris
{"title":"分解TripAdvisor:在大数据时代发现潜在的欺诈性酒店评论","authors":"Christopher G. Harris","doi":"10.1109/ICBK.2018.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of customer reviews on user purchase decisions has been well documented. For example, a one-star increase in a restaurant's Yelp rating can lead to a 5 to 9 percent increase in revenue. Unfortunately, this has motivated some businesses in review-dependent industries to falsify reviews. In the era of big data, analytical methods have made detection of these false reviews easier. We perform a longitudinal study of 2.65 million hotel reviews made by nearly 320,000 reviewers on TripAdvisor (which does not verify customers stayed at the property they reviewed) and compare them to 2.93 million reviews on other two other booking platforms, Agoda and Booking.com (which verify its reviewers stayed at least one night at the property they reviewed). We analyze the language used, the patterns of reviewer activity, and the change in hotel's reputation score over time across more than 5.5 million reviews. We find the word frequency between the two types of websites and the patterns of reviewer activity differ considerably, even though the relative ranking of hotel reputation scores across review platforms are similar.","PeriodicalId":144958,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK)","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decomposing TripAdvisor: Detecting Potentially Fraudulent Hotel Reviews in the Era of Big Data\",\"authors\":\"Christopher G. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICBK.2018.00040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The impact of customer reviews on user purchase decisions has been well documented. For example, a one-star increase in a restaurant's Yelp rating can lead to a 5 to 9 percent increase in revenue. Unfortunately, this has motivated some businesses in review-dependent industries to falsify reviews. In the era of big data, analytical methods have made detection of these false reviews easier. We perform a longitudinal study of 2.65 million hotel reviews made by nearly 320,000 reviewers on TripAdvisor (which does not verify customers stayed at the property they reviewed) and compare them to 2.93 million reviews on other two other booking platforms, Agoda and Booking.com (which verify its reviewers stayed at least one night at the property they reviewed). We analyze the language used, the patterns of reviewer activity, and the change in hotel's reputation score over time across more than 5.5 million reviews. We find the word frequency between the two types of websites and the patterns of reviewer activity differ considerably, even though the relative ranking of hotel reputation scores across review platforms are similar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK)\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBK.2018.00040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBK.2018.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

用户评论对用户购买决策的影响已经被充分证明。例如,一家餐厅在Yelp上的评级每增加一星,其收入就会增加5%到9%。不幸的是,这促使依赖于评论的行业中的一些企业伪造评论。在大数据时代,分析方法使这些虚假评论的检测变得更加容易。我们对TripAdvisor上近32万名评论者的265万条酒店评论进行了纵向研究(TripAdvisor不验证客户是否在他们所评论的酒店住过),并将这些评论与另外两个预订平台Agoda和Booking.com上的293万条评论进行了比较(Agoda和Booking.com证实其评论者至少在他们所评论的酒店住过一晚)。我们分析了使用的语言、评论者的活动模式,以及550多万条评论中酒店声誉评分随时间的变化。我们发现,尽管酒店声誉评分在点评平台上的相对排名是相似的,但两类网站的用词频率和评论者活动模式却存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decomposing TripAdvisor: Detecting Potentially Fraudulent Hotel Reviews in the Era of Big Data
The impact of customer reviews on user purchase decisions has been well documented. For example, a one-star increase in a restaurant's Yelp rating can lead to a 5 to 9 percent increase in revenue. Unfortunately, this has motivated some businesses in review-dependent industries to falsify reviews. In the era of big data, analytical methods have made detection of these false reviews easier. We perform a longitudinal study of 2.65 million hotel reviews made by nearly 320,000 reviewers on TripAdvisor (which does not verify customers stayed at the property they reviewed) and compare them to 2.93 million reviews on other two other booking platforms, Agoda and Booking.com (which verify its reviewers stayed at least one night at the property they reviewed). We analyze the language used, the patterns of reviewer activity, and the change in hotel's reputation score over time across more than 5.5 million reviews. We find the word frequency between the two types of websites and the patterns of reviewer activity differ considerably, even though the relative ranking of hotel reputation scores across review platforms are similar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信